2.6 sec in total
553 ms
1.8 sec
169 ms
Welcome to foxcroftandginger.co.uk homepage info - get ready to check Foxcroft And Ginger best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about foxcroftandginger.co.uk
Visit foxcroftandginger.co.ukWe analyzed Foxcroftandginger.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 553 ms and then it took 2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.
foxcroftandginger.co.uk performance score
553 ms
274 ms
177 ms
29 ms
40 ms
Our browser made a total of 71 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (66 requests) were addressed to the original Foxcroftandginger.co.uk, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (657 ms) belongs to the original domain Foxcroftandginger.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 318.2 kB (37%)
869.4 kB
551.2 kB
In fact, the total size of Foxcroftandginger.co.uk main page is 869.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 513.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.3 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.0 kB, which is 15% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 73.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Foxcroft And Ginger needs image optimization as it can save up to 73.6 kB or 14% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 140.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 140.6 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 87.7 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Foxcroftandginger.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 87.7 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (43%)
69
39
The browser has sent 69 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Foxcroft And Ginger. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 23 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
foxcroftandginger.co.uk
553 ms
style.css
274 ms
fonts.css
177 ms
css
29 ms
css
40 ms
swfobject.js
174 ms
jqueryui-aristo.css
348 ms
SideKick.css
176 ms
prettyPhoto.css
293 ms
uploadify.css
264 ms
admin.css
268 ms
jquery.min.js
11 ms
SideKick.utils.js
366 ms
SideKick.js
366 ms
SideKick.admin.js
367 ms
utils.js
382 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
385 ms
swfobject.js
434 ms
jquery.uploadify.3.2.min.js
612 ms
comment-reply.js
440 ms
jquery.min.js
8 ms
jquery.ui.core.min.js
367 ms
jquery.ui.widget.min.js
402 ms
jquery.ui.tabs.min.js
404 ms
jquery.ui.mouse.min.js
446 ms
jquery.ui.resizable.min.js
607 ms
jquery.ui.draggable.min.js
608 ms
jquery.ui.button.min.js
497 ms
jquery.ui.position.min.js
499 ms
jquery.ui.dialog.min.js
606 ms
editor.js
629 ms
thickbox.js
607 ms
media-upload.js
650 ms
logo.png
108 ms
1.jpg
109 ms
who_we_are_60.png
108 ms
who_we_are_hover.png
126 ms
2.jpg
146 ms
3.jpg
254 ms
gallary_60.png
182 ms
gallary_hover.png
181 ms
4.jpg
265 ms
5.jpg
219 ms
6.jpg
241 ms
7.jpg
355 ms
8.jpg
271 ms
9.jpg
407 ms
10.jpg
344 ms
food_and_drink_60.png
342 ms
food_and_drink_hover.png
356 ms
11.jpg
445 ms
cw.png
433 ms
cw_hover.png
438 ms
12.jpg
444 ms
13.jpg
445 ms
14.jpg
501 ms
15.jpg
608 ms
16.jpg
534 ms
what_we_do_60.png
534 ms
what_we_do_hover.png
534 ms
17.jpg
535 ms
18.jpg
599 ms
19.jpg
594 ms
20.jpg
598 ms
contact_us_60.png
597 ms
contact_us_hover.png
589 ms
DDy9sgU2U7S4xAwH5thnJ50EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
16 ms
21.jpg
657 ms
icon_fb.jpg
643 ms
icon_twitter.jpg
618 ms
loadingAnimation.gif
614 ms
foxcroftandginger.co.uk SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Foxcroftandginger.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Foxcroftandginger.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
foxcroftandginger.co.uk
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Foxcroft And Ginger. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: