7.4 sec in total
1.8 sec
5 sec
558 ms
Welcome to fruition.net homepage info - get ready to check Fruition best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about fruition.net
Fruition drives winning SEO, Paid Media, email and website development solutions since 2003. We are your stable, growth partner.
Visit fruition.netWe analyzed Fruition.net page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
fruition.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.4 s
97/100
10%
Value2.7 s
84/100
25%
Value1.9 s
100/100
10%
Value120 ms
97/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.6 s
81/100
10%
1811 ms
745 ms
218 ms
180 ms
211 ms
Our browser made a total of 116 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 42% of them (49 requests) were addressed to the original Fruition.net, 22% (25 requests) were made to Maps.google.com and 9% (11 requests) were made to Google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Fruition.net.
Page size can be reduced by 2.0 MB (62%)
3.2 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Fruition.net main page is 3.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 2.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 194.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 194.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 20.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Fruition images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.5 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 247.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fruition.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 247.2 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 65 (63%)
104
39
The browser has sent 104 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Fruition. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 48 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
fruition.net
1811 ms
10016286-10015559.js
745 ms
foundation.min.css
218 ms
animate.min.css
180 ms
royalslider.css
211 ms
style.css
228 ms
popup-maker-site.min.css
349 ms
custom.modernizr.js
255 ms
jquery.js
370 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
430 ms
jquery.json.js
405 ms
gravityforms.min.js
444 ms
jquery.maskedinput.min.js
436 ms
gf.placeholders.js
537 ms
jstracker.min.js
24 ms
challenge
61 ms
addthis_widget.js
43 ms
output.css
572 ms
foundation.min.js
585 ms
js
100 ms
maplace.min.js
563 ms
morphext.min.js
572 ms
isonscreen.min.js
639 ms
circles.min.js
763 ms
infinitescroll.min.js
762 ms
imagesloaded.pkgd.min.js
763 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
822 ms
royalslider.min.js
1045 ms
app.js
852 ms
core.min.js
884 ms
position.min.js
914 ms
popup-maker-site.min.js
974 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1036 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
343 ms
helvetica.css
342 ms
ionicons.min.css
378 ms
analytics.js
150 ms
prum.min.js
122 ms
blocked_sites.js
180 ms
fbevents.js
330 ms
logo.png
324 ms
lets-talk.png
334 ms
logo-text.png
331 ms
lets-talk-white.png
333 ms
scroll-down-white.png
335 ms
clients-1.png
327 ms
clients-2.png
698 ms
free-advice.png
698 ms
img.gif
299 ms
main-bg.jpg
669 ms
analytics-box-bg.jpg
700 ms
tilt-home-bg.png
666 ms
HelveticaNeue.woff
642 ms
HelveticaNeue-Light.woff
640 ms
HelveticaNeue-Medium.woff
640 ms
HelveticaNeue-Bold.woff
640 ms
ionicons.ttf
1041 ms
recaptcha.js
32 ms
collect
157 ms
y-Su-4k9eYyj6x-MrRcMqfwazYsXF-sdy8N0CzTUQBc.js
141 ms
jstracker.content.min.js
105 ms
collect
621 ms
6901.js
365 ms
common.js
321 ms
map.js
444 ms
util.js
551 ms
marker.js
522 ms
300lo.json
308 ms
sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html
238 ms
312 ms
refresh.png
40 ms
audio.png
221 ms
text.png
222 ms
help.png
221 ms
logo.png
220 ms
s
271 ms
t.js
267 ms
u
266 ms
reload
150 ms
onion.js
78 ms
ga-audiences
55 ms
stats.js
20 ms
image
38 ms
map-marker.png
410 ms
s
6 ms
layers.3643cb2e25fb91c29386.js
21 ms
controls.js
210 ms
ViewportInfoService.GetViewportInfo
327 ms
transparent.png
213 ms
css
138 ms
google4.png
238 ms
mapcnt6.png
248 ms
tmapctrl.png
163 ms
cb_scout5.png
175 ms
tmapctrl4.png
163 ms
vt
165 ms
vt
203 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
82 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
126 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
183 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
186 ms
vt
28 ms
vt
57 ms
vt
39 ms
vt
81 ms
vt
49 ms
vt
79 ms
vt
58 ms
vt
180 ms
vt
68 ms
vt
179 ms
vt
121 ms
vt
180 ms
vt
121 ms
vt
181 ms
vt
180 ms
fruition.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
fruition.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
fruition.net SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fruition.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fruition.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fruition.net
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Fruition. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: