3.3 sec in total
172 ms
2.6 sec
462 ms
Welcome to fxcompared.com homepage info - get ready to check FXcompared best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about fxcompared.com
Find the best money saving deals for your international money transfer today. The smart way to compare overseas transfer rates when you send money abroad.
Visit fxcompared.comWe analyzed Fxcompared.com page load time and found that the first response time was 172 ms and then it took 3.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
fxcompared.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
90/100
10%
Value2.7 s
85/100
25%
Value2.2 s
99/100
10%
Value140 ms
95/100
30%
Value0.046
99/100
15%
Value4.4 s
83/100
10%
172 ms
296 ms
260 ms
557 ms
182 ms
Our browser made a total of 91 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 5% of them (5 requests) were addressed to the original Fxcompared.com, 81% (74 requests) were made to S3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1 sec) relates to the external source S3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com.
Page size can be reduced by 788.6 kB (54%)
1.5 MB
663.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Fxcompared.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 732.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 83.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 19.8 kB, which is 19% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 83.9 kB or 79% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 29.9 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. FXcompared images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 474.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 474.6 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 200.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Fxcompared.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 200.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 44 (53%)
83
39
The browser has sent 83 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of FXcompared. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
fxcompared.com
172 ms
www.fxcompared.com
296 ms
jquery.js
260 ms
general.css
557 ms
font-awesome.css
182 ms
view.css
185 ms
dropdown.min.js
401 ms
header.js
373 ms
selectize.min.js
576 ms
general.js
406 ms
affiliate-manager.js
397 ms
transition.min.js
574 ms
collapse.min.js
580 ms
affix.js
579 ms
tooltip.min.js
581 ms
popover.min.js
585 ms
broker-list.js
593 ms
jquery.cookie.min.js
595 ms
moment.min.js
756 ms
carousel.min.js
620 ms
tab.min.js
679 ms
index.js
679 ms
fx-compared-logo-m.jpg
169 ms
home_icon.png
211 ms
customSelectArrows.png
210 ms
bg.jpg
361 ms
tabsBottomBg.png
357 ms
individualIconSelected.png
358 ms
tabsSelectedBg.png
358 ms
businessIcon.png
359 ms
BBC_Logo.png
457 ms
Reuters_logo25.png
361 ms
forbes-logo.png
524 ms
Bloomberg-Businessweek-logo_small25.png
463 ms
logo_tim25.png
455 ms
worldbank25.jpg
458 ms
bestValue.png
465 ms
safeAndSecure.png
530 ms
globalCoverage.png
554 ms
prperty231.jpg
559 ms
Larg-Thumb_0001_emigration.jpg
813 ms
imti320162.png
959 ms
Consumer_report_image_sq320.jpg
797 ms
internationalstudentpicture.jpg
807 ms
76mobilemoney.jpg
652 ms
analytics.js
55 ms
quote_left.png
615 ms
quote_right.png
700 ms
thetelegraph.png
719 ms
forbes.png
797 ms
carousel_arrow_left.png
811 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
61 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
73 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
100 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
123 ms
EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
122 ms
carousel_arrow_right.png
855 ms
gbr.svg
850 ms
usa.svg
847 ms
aus.svg
884 ms
can.svg
873 ms
linkid.js
19 ms
collect
31 ms
fra.svg
859 ms
deu.svg
853 ms
ind.svg
840 ms
collect
174 ms
irl.svg
841 ms
isr.svg
856 ms
addthis_widget.js
34 ms
ita.svg
714 ms
jpn.svg
787 ms
mex.svg
1017 ms
nzl.svg
775 ms
nor.svg
878 ms
phl.svg
805 ms
pol.svg
801 ms
qat.svg
778 ms
sgp.svg
783 ms
zaf.svg
810 ms
esp.svg
873 ms
swe.svg
868 ms
che.svg
802 ms
tha.svg
821 ms
are.svg
813 ms
fb.png
860 ms
tw.png
888 ms
gp.png
875 ms
ln.png
697 ms
300lo.json
93 ms
sh.7c7179124ea24ac6ba46caac.html
51 ms
fxcompared.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Form elements do not have associated labels
fxcompared.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
fxcompared.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Fxcompared.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Fxcompared.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
fxcompared.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of FXcompared. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: