Tools & Wizards About Us
gcop.net screenshot

Report Summary

  • 81

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 60

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 26% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

gcop.net

gcop.net

Page Load Speed

975 ms in total

First Response

295 ms

Resources Loaded

547 ms

Page Rendered

133 ms

gcop.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to gcop.net homepage info - get ready to check Gcop best content right away, or after learning these important things about gcop.net

This domain may be for sale!

Visit gcop.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Gcop.net page load time and found that the first response time was 295 ms and then it took 680 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 10% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gcop.net performance score

81

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

70/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value50 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.198

62/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.2 s

95/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gcop.net

295 ms

style.css

83 ms

ban2.png

160 ms

cp.png

86 ms

mail2.png

86 ms

Our browser made a total of 17 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 6% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Gcop.net, 94% (16 requests) were made to Hostgatorsupport.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (295 ms) belongs to the original domain Gcop.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 21.3 kB (24%)

Content Size

88.1 kB

After Optimization

66.9 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gcop.net main page is 88.1 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 81.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 4.1 kB
  • After minification 3.9 kB
  • After compression 1.2 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 2.9 kB or 71% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-20%

Potential reduce by 16.6 kB

  • Original 81.6 kB
  • After minification 65.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gcop needs image optimization as it can save up to 16.6 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

CSS Optimization

-73%

Potential reduce by 1.7 kB

  • Original 2.4 kB
  • After minification 1.9 kB
  • After compression 652 B

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gcop.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 1.7 kB or 73% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

16

After Optimization

16

  • Images
  • CSS

The browser has sent 16 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gcop. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.

Network Requests Diagram

gcop.net

gcop.net

295 ms

style.css

style.css

83 ms

ban2.png

ban2.png

160 ms

cp.png

cp.png

86 ms

mail2.png

mail2.png

86 ms

start.png

start.png

92 ms

dollar.png

dollar.png

95 ms

filmstrip2.jpg

filmstrip2.jpg

161 ms

com.png

com.png

160 ms

book3.png

book3.png

161 ms

mail1.png

mail1.png

171 ms

people.png

people.png

173 ms

phone2.png

phone2.png

236 ms

banner1.jpg

banner1.jpg

237 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

159 ms

bg_content.gif

bg_content.gif

159 ms

bg_footer.gif

bg_footer.gif

171 ms

Accessibility Review

gcop.net accessibility score

60

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

gcop.net best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

gcop.net SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    ISO-8859-1

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gcop.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Gcop.net main page’s claimed encoding is iso-8859-1. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

gcop.net

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gcop. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: