9.1 sec in total
2.7 sec
5.8 sec
605 ms
Welcome to geotechnicaldesign.info homepage info - get ready to check Geotechnicaldesign best content for Russia right away, or after learning these important things about geotechnicaldesign.info
Visit geotechnicaldesign.infoWe analyzed Geotechnicaldesign.info page load time and found that the first response time was 2.7 sec and then it took 6.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
geotechnicaldesign.info performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.1 s
82/100
10%
Value2.1 s
96/100
25%
Value4.1 s
80/100
10%
Value940 ms
29/100
30%
Value1.075
2/100
15%
Value7.1 s
52/100
10%
2694 ms
152 ms
311 ms
312 ms
309 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 69% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Geotechnicaldesign.info, 5% (4 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com and 5% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Geotechnicaldesign.info.
Page size can be reduced by 746.4 kB (56%)
1.3 MB
589.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Geotechnicaldesign.info main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 746.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 125.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 125.2 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 61.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Geotechnicaldesign needs image optimization as it can save up to 61.7 kB or 20% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 450.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 450.3 kB or 60% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 109.2 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Geotechnicaldesign.info needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 109.2 kB or 88% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 49 (68%)
72
23
The browser has sent 72 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Geotechnicaldesign. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 25 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
geotechnicaldesign.info
2694 ms
system.base.css
152 ms
system.menus.css
311 ms
system.messages.css
312 ms
system.theme.css
309 ms
comment.css
308 ms
field.css
309 ms
node.css
310 ms
picture_wysiwyg.css
441 ms
search.css
444 ms
user.css
446 ms
views.css
444 ms
ckeditor.css
437 ms
ctools.css
441 ms
at.layout.css
562 ms
global.base.css
566 ms
global.styles.css
568 ms
gd.styles.css
563 ms
at_geodesign.responsive.layout.css
572 ms
responsive.custom.css
576 ms
responsive.desktop.css
694 ms
jquery.min.js
874 ms
jquery.once.js
738 ms
drupal.js
707 ms
picturefill.min.js
737 ms
picture.min.js
723 ms
ru__2f-lfAGTAupIF8WlF9smEoNvS1rlAkm0ER3boRtqhc.js
848 ms
jquery.min.js
1016 ms
jquery.poshytip.js
942 ms
tip.js
943 ms
remark.js
943 ms
script.js
998 ms
dfp_head1.js
1042 ms
dfp_head2.js
1043 ms
upbutton2.js
1044 ms
addthis_widget.js
289 ms
brand
113 ms
adsbygoogle.js
93 ms
brand
214 ms
css
54 ms
gpt.js
85 ms
logo.png
398 ms
cover_en6100-3.jpg
398 ms
cover_ec7p1.jpg
399 ms
cover_ec7p2.jpg
404 ms
cover_ec7p3.jpg
404 ms
cover_en1536.jpg
405 ms
cover_en1537.jpg
530 ms
cover_en1538.jpg
403 ms
cover_en12063.jpg
400 ms
cover_en12699.jpg
1276 ms
cover_en12716.jpg
785 ms
cover_iso13793.jpg
535 ms
cover_iso22475-1.jpg
703 ms
UyYrYy3ltEffJV9QueSi4Xd-At88qgtmonwzrTIRZp4.woff
324 ms
Q_pTky3Sc3ubRibGToTAYkKPiUKLk90OP03KDiMBWXs.woff
325 ms
google_custom_search_watermark.gif
279 ms
pubads_impl_83.js
275 ms
ca-pub-5808146747716795.js
340 ms
zrt_lookup.html
326 ms
show_ads_impl.js
324 ms
pix_blue.png
257 ms
watch.js
105 ms
analytics.js
154 ms
300lo.json
312 ms
sh.953eb77977227bfd253ee158.html
164 ms
container.html
273 ms
collect
209 ms
ads
407 ms
osd.js
58 ms
layers.486057f6e3ab422798c9.js
126 ms
ru.js
125 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
168 ms
responsive.smalltouch.portrait.css
202 ms
responsive.smalltouch.landscape.css
190 ms
responsive.tablet.portrait.css
140 ms
responsive.tablet.landscape.css
150 ms
geotechnicaldesign.info accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
geotechnicaldesign.info best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
geotechnicaldesign.info SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
RU
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Geotechnicaldesign.info can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Russian language. Our system also found out that Geotechnicaldesign.info main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
geotechnicaldesign.info
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Geotechnicaldesign. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: