Report Summary

  • 16

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    30% of other websites

  • 88

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 69% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

glaston.net

Glaston

Page Load Speed

3.4 sec in total

First Response

638 ms

Resources Loaded

2.6 sec

Page Rendered

180 ms

glaston.net screenshot

About Website

Welcome to glaston.net homepage info - get ready to check Glaston best content for Finland right away, or after learning these important things about glaston.net

We develop glass processing machinery and services for architectural, solar, appliance and automotive applications.

Visit glaston.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Glaston.net page load time and found that the first response time was 638 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

glaston.net performance score

16

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.0 s

4/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value10.1 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value17.3 s

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value4,720 ms

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.003

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value19.3 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

glaston.net

638 ms

jquery.js

649 ms

jquery.jwbox.js

224 ms

swfobject.js

438 ms

jwbox.css

222 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Glaston.net, 12% (9 requests) were made to Otp.investis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Glaston.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 925.4 kB (50%)

Content Size

1.8 MB

After Optimization

914.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Glaston.net main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 706.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 42.4 kB

  • Original 60.4 kB
  • After minification 55.9 kB
  • After compression 17.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.4 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 57.8 kB

  • Original 688.2 kB
  • After minification 630.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Glaston images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 470.4 kB

  • Original 706.2 kB
  • After minification 679.3 kB
  • After compression 235.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 470.4 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-92%

Potential reduce by 354.9 kB

  • Original 384.7 kB
  • After minification 168.8 kB
  • After compression 29.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glaston.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 354.9 kB or 92% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (50%)

Requests Now

74

After Optimization

37

The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glaston. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

glaston.net accessibility score

88

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

glaston.net best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

glaston.net SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glaston.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Glaston.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Glaston. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: