3.4 sec in total
638 ms
2.6 sec
180 ms
Welcome to glaston.net homepage info - get ready to check Glaston best content for Finland right away, or after learning these important things about glaston.net
We develop glass processing machinery and services for architectural, solar, appliance and automotive applications.
Visit glaston.netWe analyzed Glaston.net page load time and found that the first response time was 638 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
glaston.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.0 s
4/100
10%
Value10.1 s
0/100
25%
Value17.3 s
0/100
10%
Value4,720 ms
0/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value19.3 s
2/100
10%
638 ms
649 ms
224 ms
438 ms
222 ms
Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 70% of them (53 requests) were addressed to the original Glaston.net, 12% (9 requests) were made to Otp.investis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Glaston.net.
Page size can be reduced by 925.4 kB (50%)
1.8 MB
914.1 kB
In fact, the total size of Glaston.net main page is 1.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 706.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 42.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.4 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 57.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Glaston images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 470.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 470.4 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 354.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Glaston.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 354.9 kB or 92% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (50%)
74
37
The browser has sent 74 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Glaston. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
glaston.net
638 ms
jquery.js
649 ms
jquery.jwbox.js
224 ms
swfobject.js
438 ms
jwbox.css
222 ms
menu.js
226 ms
colorbox.css
314 ms
jquery.colorbox-min.js
435 ms
normalize.css
435 ms
app.css
1134 ms
jquery.functions.js
419 ms
jquery-1.9.1.min.js
783 ms
flexslider.css
542 ms
jquery.flexslider.js
758 ms
carousel.js
544 ms
addthis_widget.js
14 ms
snoop.php
227 ms
css
24 ms
styles.css
114 ms
ie.css
112 ms
ie8grid.css
115 ms
responsive.css
116 ms
customStylesforEpi.css
117 ms
lg-share-en.gif
22 ms
arrow.png
124 ms
glastonLogo.png
127 ms
home.jpg
125 ms
GlastonCorp_01.jpg
335 ms
GlastonCorp_02.jpg
128 ms
GlastonMachines_03.jpg
550 ms
GlastonServices_04.jpg
331 ms
Glaston%20architecture.jpg
249 ms
Glaston%20appliances%202.jpg
250 ms
Glaston%20automotive.jpg
278 ms
Glaston%20solar.jpg
336 ms
facebook-icon.png
338 ms
twitter-bird-white-on-blue.png
346 ms
youtube_icon1362737322.png
440 ms
LinkedIn-logo.png
445 ms
Quality_lifecycle_services_image.jpg
553 ms
ChinaGlass_ENG_web.png
446 ms
2%20mm%20fully%20tempered%20glass.jpg
459 ms
AGM.jpg
550 ms
gtm.js
104 ms
ticker_e.php
232 ms
omx-news.aspx
408 ms
headerBg.jpg
540 ms
buttonSprite.png
542 ms
menuBgSprite.jpg
558 ms
contentBannersBg.jpg
641 ms
contenShareBg.jpg
642 ms
productInfoBg.jpg
666 ms
headerUnderline.png
649 ms
iZwo_au2Ttqpr5ULCMtdgqCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
15 ms
bannerHeaderBg.jpg
545 ms
snoop2.php
146 ms
analytics.js
68 ms
300lo.json
69 ms
overlay.png
472 ms
controls.png
554 ms
border.png
552 ms
loading_background.png
558 ms
loading.gif
559 ms
bg_direction_nav.png
598 ms
sh.8e5f85691f9aaa082472a194.html
51 ms
collect
44 ms
collect
68 ms
up.gif
96 ms
omx-main.css
89 ms
TogglePopup.js
162 ms
WebResource.axd
249 ms
ScriptResource.axd
421 ms
ScriptResource.axd
292 ms
CallServer.js
172 ms
preview.png
94 ms
pdf.gif
81 ms
glaston.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
glaston.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
glaston.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Glaston.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Glaston.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
glaston.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Glaston. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: