5.1 sec in total
1.3 sec
3.5 sec
341 ms
Visit gleamtechnologies.com now to see the best up-to-date Gleam Technologies content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about gleamtechnologies.com
Gleam Technologies is a global leader in next-generation digital services and consulting.
Visit gleamtechnologies.comWe analyzed Gleamtechnologies.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
gleamtechnologies.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value7.6 s
0/100
10%
Value12.4 s
0/100
25%
Value7.6 s
25/100
10%
Value160 ms
93/100
30%
Value0.223
56/100
15%
Value11.8 s
17/100
10%
1273 ms
25 ms
116 ms
102 ms
14 ms
Our browser made a total of 54 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 65% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Gleamtechnologies.com, 20% (11 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Demo.select-themes.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Gleamtechnologies.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (49%)
3.0 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Gleamtechnologies.com main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Gleam Technologies images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 977.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 977.3 kB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 444.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gleamtechnologies.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 444.3 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (80%)
40
8
The browser has sent 40 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gleam Technologies. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 12 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.gleamtechnologies.com
1273 ms
css
25 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
116 ms
layerslider.css
102 ms
css
14 ms
style.css
88 ms
stylesheet.min.css
189 ms
style_dynamic.css
120 ms
font-awesome.min.css
147 ms
style.min.css
165 ms
responsive.min.css
168 ms
style_dynamic_responsive.css
164 ms
js_composer.css
237 ms
custom_css.css
210 ms
jquery.js
300 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
256 ms
layerslider.kreaturamedia.jquery.js
319 ms
greensock.js
317 ms
layerslider.transitions.js
284 ms
qode-like.js
63 ms
plugins.js
256 ms
jquery.carouFredSel-6.2.1.js
105 ms
jquery.fullPage.min.js
75 ms
lemmon-slider.js
81 ms
jquery.mousewheel.min.js
152 ms
jquery.touchSwipe.min.js
153 ms
isotope.pkgd.min.js
144 ms
js
86 ms
default_dynamic.js
148 ms
default.min.js
206 ms
custom_js.js
196 ms
comment-reply.min.js
204 ms
ajax.min.js
196 ms
js_composer_front.js
209 ms
recaptcha_ajax.js
24 ms
logo1.jpg
174 ms
H1.jpg
541 ms
H2.jpg
534 ms
H3.jpg
400 ms
H4.jpg
467 ms
paralaks-11.jpg
337 ms
bIcY3_3JNqUVRAQQRNVteQ.ttf
115 ms
CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T8y3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
113 ms
-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAriS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
116 ms
8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-ky3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
114 ms
RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
114 ms
xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12by3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
114 ms
JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaIy3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
114 ms
1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
114 ms
PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
115 ms
5xAt7XK2vkUdjhGtt98uneLrC4Du4e_yfTJ8Ol60xk0.ttf
114 ms
ZCcPJiCGOzh84o2siPk48Z0EAVxt0G0biEntp43Qt6E.ttf
115 ms
ElegantIcons.woff
169 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
152 ms
gleamtechnologies.com accessibility score
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
gleamtechnologies.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
gleamtechnologies.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gleamtechnologies.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Gleamtechnologies.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
gleamtechnologies.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gleam Technologies. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: