5.3 sec in total
532 ms
4.5 sec
257 ms
Click here to check amazing Graceplanning content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about graceplanning.net
あなたの欲しい1着が見つかる!ウェディングドレス~カラードレスを格安で。サイズオーダーも可能です。
Visit graceplanning.netWe analyzed Graceplanning.net page load time and found that the first response time was 532 ms and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
graceplanning.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.9 s
4/100
10%
Value6.2 s
11/100
25%
Value9.8 s
10/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value6.4 s
60/100
10%
532 ms
2283 ms
357 ms
540 ms
371 ms
Our browser made a total of 40 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 95% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Graceplanning.net, 3% (1 request) were made to Ajaxzip3.googlecode.com and 3% (1 request) were made to Image.rakuten.co.jp. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.3 sec) belongs to the original domain Graceplanning.net.
Page size can be reduced by 165.6 kB (24%)
693.3 kB
527.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Graceplanning.net main page is 693.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 501.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 61.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 20.5 kB, which is 28% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 61.0 kB or 85% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Graceplanning images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 64.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 64.3 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 23.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Graceplanning.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 23.5 kB or 85% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (27%)
37
27
The browser has sent 37 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Graceplanning. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 6 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
graceplanning.net
532 ms
2283 ms
import.css
357 ms
css.js
540 ms
navi.js
371 ms
win_op.js
370 ms
site.js
568 ms
jquery-1.4.2.min.js
1243 ms
ajaxzip3-https.js
90 ms
plg_ajaxzip3.js
555 ms
bestpurchase.css
556 ms
base.css
363 ms
common.css
567 ms
navigation.css
384 ms
contents.css
401 ms
popup.css
543 ms
t-rev.jpg
885 ms
20150319-1.jpg
496 ms
back.gif
375 ms
header_logo.jpg
370 ms
header_navi01_on.jpg
187 ms
header_navi01_off.jpg
190 ms
header_navi02_on.jpg
191 ms
header_navi02_off.jpg
193 ms
header_navi03_on.jpg
358 ms
header_navi03_off.jpg
363 ms
bg_subtitle.gif
371 ms
btn_bloc_search.jpg
380 ms
btn_bloc_cart.jpg
535 ms
btn_bloc_login.jpg
542 ms
topso.jpg
1117 ms
resize_image.php
1118 ms
resize_image.php
850 ms
resize_image.php
853 ms
resize_image.php
1005 ms
resize_image.php
976 ms
btn_rss.gif
1039 ms
bg_icon01.gif
858 ms
bg_guide.jpg
973 ms
bg_guide2.jpg
1006 ms
graceplanning.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
graceplanning.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
graceplanning.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document doesn't use legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
JA
JA
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Graceplanning.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Japanese is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Graceplanning.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
graceplanning.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Graceplanning. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: