Tools & Wizards About Us
gropoint.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 18

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    34% of other websites

  • 73

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 39% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

gropoint.com

GroPoint Soil Moisture Sensing

Page Load Speed

2.4 sec in total

First Response

183 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

117 ms

gropoint.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Gro Point content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about gropoint.com

GroPoint soil probes use patented TDT technology to record soil moisture at multiple depths as well as a true soil moisture profile. Our soil probes have soil temperature sensors every 10 cm. GroPoint...

Visit gropoint.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Gropoint.com page load time and found that the first response time was 183 ms and then it took 2.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 40% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

gropoint.com performance score

18

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value8.4 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value18.6 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value13.1 s

2/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,900 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.056

98/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value20.4 s

2/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

gropoint.com

183 ms

www.esica.com

551 ms

global.css

197 ms

global.js

208 ms

pop_core.js

301 ms

Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Gropoint.com, 90% (27 requests) were made to Esica.com and 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (793 ms) relates to the external source Esica.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 51.4 kB (53%)

Content Size

97.9 kB

After Optimization

46.5 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Gropoint.com main page is 97.9 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 51.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-22%

Potential reduce by 28 B

  • Original 130 B
  • After minification 130 B
  • After compression 102 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28 B or 22% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-48%

Potential reduce by 16.3 kB

  • Original 34.0 kB
  • After minification 17.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Gro Point needs image optimization as it can save up to 16.3 kB or 48% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-49%

Potential reduce by 25.5 kB

  • Original 51.9 kB
  • After minification 42.0 kB
  • After compression 26.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 25.5 kB or 49% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 9.7 kB

  • Original 11.9 kB
  • After minification 9.7 kB
  • After compression 2.2 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Gropoint.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 9.7 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (59%)

Requests Now

29

After Optimization

12

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 29 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Gro Point. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

gropoint.com

gropoint.com

183 ms

www.esica.com

www.esica.com

551 ms

global.css

global.css

197 ms

global.js

global.js

208 ms

pop_core.js

pop_core.js

301 ms

pop_data.js

pop_data.js

341 ms

pop_events.js

pop_events.js

220 ms

back.gif

back.gif

314 ms

menu_bullet.gif

menu_bullet.gif

201 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

190 ms

topmenu_home_off.gif

topmenu_home_off.gif

205 ms

topmenu_sitemap_off.gif

topmenu_sitemap_off.gif

205 ms

topmenu_contact_off.gif

topmenu_contact_off.gif

195 ms

mygropoint-login.jpg

mygropoint-login.jpg

381 ms

button_go.gif

button_go.gif

380 ms

menu_applications.gif

menu_applications.gif

390 ms

menu_products.gif

menu_products.gif

373 ms

menu_corporate.gif

menu_corporate.gif

383 ms

menu_support.gif

menu_support.gif

483 ms

menu_testimonials.gif

menu_testimonials.gif

562 ms

menu_resellers.gif

menu_resellers.gif

550 ms

menu_links.gif

menu_links.gif

551 ms

menu_login.gif

menu_login.gif

551 ms

splash_bg.jpg

splash_bg.jpg

787 ms

tagline.gif

tagline.gif

680 ms

splash_pic1.gif

splash_pic1.gif

793 ms

products_select.gif

products_select.gif

722 ms

ga.js

ga.js

8 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

13 ms

print.css

print.css

173 ms

Accessibility Review

gropoint.com accessibility score

73

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best Practices

gropoint.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

gropoint.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Gropoint.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Gropoint.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

gropoint.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Gro Point. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: