4.4 sec in total
1.9 sec
2.2 sec
272 ms
Welcome to historyscoper.com homepage info - get ready to check Historyscoper best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about historyscoper.com
Rabbit Hole for the Historyscoper (tm).
Visit historyscoper.comWe analyzed Historyscoper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
historyscoper.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.7 s
100/100
10%
Value0.7 s
100/100
25%
Value0.7 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value0.7 s
100/100
10%
1929 ms
78 ms
302 ms
318 ms
Our browser made a total of 4 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Historyscoper.com and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Historyscoper.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.4 kB (12%)
11.0 kB
9.6 kB
In fact, the total size of Historyscoper.com main page is 11.0 kB. This result falls within a vast category (top 1 000 000) of heavyweight, probably not optimized, and thus slow loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 9.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 578 B
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 578 B or 49% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 788 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Historyscoper images are well optimized though.
We found no issues to fix!
3
3
The browser has sent 3 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Historyscoper. According to our analytics all requests are already optimized.
historyscoper.com
1929 ms
sandback.jpg
78 ms
redpill.jpg
302 ms
rabbithole.jpg
318 ms
historyscoper.com accessibility score
historyscoper.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
historyscoper.com SEO score
EN
N/A
WINDOWS-1252
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Historyscoper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Historyscoper.com main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1252. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
historyscoper.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Historyscoper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: