6.5 sec in total
302 ms
5.9 sec
238 ms
Welcome to homestaging.com homepage info - get ready to check Homestaging best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about homestaging.com
Find a Home Stager at the #1 Site for Home Staging -- HomeStaging.com - Resources for Home Stagers and Home Staging Tips
Visit homestaging.comWe analyzed Homestaging.com page load time and found that the first response time was 302 ms and then it took 6.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
homestaging.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
56/100
10%
Value3.0 s
77/100
25%
Value2.8 s
96/100
10%
Value90 ms
99/100
30%
Value0.167
71/100
15%
Value3.0 s
96/100
10%
302 ms
90 ms
146 ms
159 ms
168 ms
Our browser made a total of 96 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (69 requests) were addressed to the original Homestaging.com, 7% (7 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 2% (2 requests) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Homestaging.com.
Page size can be reduced by 537.3 kB (35%)
1.5 MB
981.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Homestaging.com main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 757.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 104.0 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 104.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 25.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Homestaging images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 289.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 289.4 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 118.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Homestaging.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 118.3 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 55 (60%)
92
37
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Homestaging. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 19 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.homestaging.com
302 ms
style.css
90 ms
default.css
146 ms
slimbox.css
159 ms
colorbox.css
168 ms
jquery.nivo.slider.pack.js
2818 ms
jquery.min.js
57 ms
jquery.colorbox.js
171 ms
script.js
171 ms
effects.js
217 ms
q-a-plus.css
234 ms
nivoslider.css
250 ms
jcarousel.css
252 ms
style.css
253 ms
nggallery.css
286 ms
shutter-reloaded.css
309 ms
moonrayJS-only-wp-forms.css
235 ms
105 ms
jquery-ui.css
63 ms
tracking.js
230 ms
jquery.js
496 ms
jwplayer.js
418 ms
nivoslider.js
331 ms
jcarousel.js
353 ms
init.js
383 ms
shutter-reloaded.js
415 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
424 ms
ngg.slideshow.min.js
460 ms
1-default.css
499 ms
dhtmlgoodies_calendar.css
497 ms
jsonSuggest.css
494 ms
conversion.js
39 ms
pinit.js
41 ms
tracking.js
41 ms
q-a-plus.js
532 ms
reset.css
501 ms
ga.js
39 ms
w.js
78 ms
home-staging.png
84 ms
top_nav_sepretor.png
79 ms
nav-back.png
178 ms
magnifier.png
84 ms
homestaging_13.jpg
156 ms
homestaging_21.jpg
179 ms
homestaging_31.jpg
623 ms
homestaging_41.jpg
624 ms
homestaging_51.jpg
624 ms
homestaging_61.jpg
624 ms
homestaging_71.jpg
625 ms
homestaging_81.jpg
623 ms
homestaging_91.jpg
626 ms
homestaging_101.jpg
627 ms
homestaging_111.jpg
624 ms
homestaging_121.jpg
626 ms
homestaging_131.jpg
625 ms
add-image-1.png
627 ms
add-image-2.png
628 ms
directory_listing.png
627 ms
thumb.php
628 ms
read-more.png
627 ms
thumb.php
631 ms
thumb.php
628 ms
thumb.php
630 ms
thumb.php
664 ms
Banner_2651.png
628 ms
search-box.png
620 ms
__utm.gif
31 ms
slider-arrows.png
598 ms
add-back.png
677 ms
featured.png
622 ms
divider.png
624 ms
on.png
629 ms
normal.png
660 ms
widget-top.png
705 ms
widget-body.png
705 ms
likebox.php
100 ms
50 ms
plusone.js
58 ms
pinit_main.js
48 ms
widget-bottom.png
674 ms
80 ms
footer-top-header.png
673 ms
footer-top-body.png
698 ms
28 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
6 ms
51 ms
kyEKgjk51ZE.css
15 ms
q68gy-v_YMF.js
18 ms
FJmpeSpHpjS.js
34 ms
0wM5s1Khldu.js
31 ms
1bNoFZUdlYZ.js
32 ms
overlay.png
637 ms
I6-MnjEovm5.js
19 ms
pQrUxxo5oQp.js
18 ms
print.css
86 ms
track.php
214 ms
homestaging.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
homestaging.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
homestaging.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Homestaging.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Homestaging.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
homestaging.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Homestaging. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: