Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

Page Load Speed

965 ms in total

First Response

434 ms

Resources Loaded

439 ms

Page Rendered

92 ms

hotel-comparison.net screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Hotel Comparison content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about hotel-comparison.net

Visit hotel-comparison.net

Key Findings

We analyzed Hotel-comparison.net page load time and found that the first response time was 434 ms and then it took 531 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only 5% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

hotel-comparison.net performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

hotel-comparison.net

434 ms

Our browser made a total of 1 request to load all elements on the main page. We found that all of those requests were addressed to Hotel-comparison.net and no external sources were called. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (434 ms) belongs to the original domain Hotel-comparison.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 583.2 kB (36%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

1.0 MB

In fact, the total size of Hotel-comparison.net main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls within the top 5000 of lightweight and thus fast loading web pages. Only a small number of websites need less resources to load. Images take 991.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-32%

Potential reduce by 82 B

  • Original 259 B
  • After minification 257 B
  • After compression 177 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 82 B or 32% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-16%

Potential reduce by 156.8 kB

  • Original 991.5 kB
  • After minification 834.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Hotel Comparison needs image optimization as it can save up to 156.8 kB or 16% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-60%

Potential reduce by 283.2 kB

  • Original 469.8 kB
  • After minification 459.2 kB
  • After compression 186.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 283.2 kB or 60% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 143.1 kB

  • Original 167.2 kB
  • After minification 150.4 kB
  • After compression 24.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Hotel-comparison.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 143.1 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

We found no issues to fix!

Requests Now

0

After Optimization

0

Besides the initial HTML request, no CSS, Javascripts, AJAX or image files were requested in the course of web page rendering.

SEO Factors

hotel-comparison.net SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Hotel-comparison.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Hotel-comparison.net main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Hotel Comparison. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: