3.1 sec in total
559 ms
2.4 sec
171 ms
Click here to check amazing Ifont content for Russia. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about ifont.ru
Большой каталог шрифтов. Всё о шрифтах, полиграфии и допечатной подготовке.
Visit ifont.ruWe analyzed Ifont.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 559 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
ifont.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.9 s
100/100
10%
Value3.4 s
66/100
25%
Value3.7 s
85/100
10%
Value290 ms
79/100
30%
Value0.005
100/100
15%
Value7.6 s
46/100
10%
559 ms
170 ms
16 ms
240 ms
258 ms
Our browser made a total of 56 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 52% of them (29 requests) were addressed to the original Ifont.ru, 9% (5 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 9% (5 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (572 ms) belongs to the original domain Ifont.ru.
Page size can be reduced by 32.2 kB (56%)
57.6 kB
25.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Ifont.ru main page is 57.6 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 32.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 30.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 27.5 kB, which is 84% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 30.8 kB or 94% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 0 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Ifont images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.
Potential reduce by 61 B
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ifont.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 61 B or 25% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 33 (65%)
51
18
The browser has sent 51 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ifont. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
ifont.ru
559 ms
template_css.css
170 ms
show_ads.js
16 ms
context.js
240 ms
top100.cnt
258 ms
banner-88x31-rambler-gray2.gif
255 ms
top_line.jpg
139 ms
logo.jpg
274 ms
points.jpg
273 ms
top_menu.jpg
275 ms
search_input_bg.jpg
276 ms
search_bg.jpg
274 ms
home.jpg
276 ms
devider.jpg
418 ms
letter.jpg
414 ms
left_devider.jpg
419 ms
right_triple.jpg
418 ms
right_ugol.jpg
419 ms
DIPEDM.png
419 ms
dev.gif
552 ms
indent1.png
551 ms
AlphaClouds.png
555 ms
Amano.png
572 ms
bottom_left.jpg
558 ms
context_static_r1082.js
344 ms
77802
121 ms
watch.js
0 ms
left_bg.jpg
162 ms
top_left.jpg
162 ms
arrow.jpg
161 ms
ca-pub-1885000219129768.js
164 ms
zrt_lookup.html
224 ms
show_ads_impl.js
93 ms
shadow.jpg
215 ms
dotted.gif
201 ms
font_name_bg.jpg
201 ms
view_font.jpg
260 ms
download.jpg
261 ms
t.bbn
407 ms
footer_bg.jpg
242 ms
hit
277 ms
ads
245 ms
osd.js
47 ms
ads
219 ms
ads
243 ms
hit
130 ms
counter2
191 ms
counter2
182 ms
88.gif
377 ms
m_js_controller.js
104 ms
abg.js
129 ms
favicon
73 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
61 ms
s
31 ms
x_button_blue2.svg
26 ms
Rf2QnA3orEL6Eez56HJgxRuQ77qJyxbefnbSCBE0iUQ.js
6 ms
ifont.ru accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Form elements do not have associated labels
Links do not have a discernible name
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
ifont.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
ifont.ru SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
RU
RU
WINDOWS-1251
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ifont.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ifont.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
ifont.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ifont. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: