3.4 sec in total
324 ms
2.7 sec
320 ms
Visit igema.net now to see the best up-to-date IGEMA content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about igema.net
IGEMA es una escuela universitaria donde podrás cursar tu grado ADE en Barcelona. Ofrecemos una educación adaptada al entorno y a la realidad empresarial.
Visit igema.netWe analyzed Igema.net page load time and found that the first response time was 324 ms and then it took 3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 55% of websites can load faster.
igema.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value10.3 s
0/100
10%
Value33.7 s
0/100
25%
Value32.1 s
0/100
10%
Value1,930 ms
8/100
30%
Value0.163
72/100
15%
Value34.0 s
0/100
10%
324 ms
1204 ms
163 ms
178 ms
261 ms
Our browser made a total of 65 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 83% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Igema.net, 6% (4 requests) were made to Translate.googleapis.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Igema.net.
Page size can be reduced by 420.3 kB (35%)
1.2 MB
764.7 kB
In fact, the total size of Igema.net main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 35% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 562.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 63.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 22.1 kB, which is 29% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 63.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. IGEMA images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 269.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 269.7 kB or 59% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 72.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Igema.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 72.3 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (52%)
61
29
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of IGEMA. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
igema.net
324 ms
www.igema.net
1204 ms
grid-12.css
163 ms
gantry.css
178 ms
joomla.css
261 ms
css
24 ms
template.css
264 ms
typography.css
180 ms
fusionmenu.css
240 ms
mootools-core.js
358 ms
core.js
258 ms
caption.js
268 ms
mootools-more.js
580 ms
gantry-totop.js
343 ms
fusion.js
345 ms
besps.js
347 ms
besps.css
307 ms
css
15 ms
element.js
34 ms
EUCookieDirective.js
262 ms
pattern_9.png
464 ms
shadow.png
136 ms
bottom-shadow.png
263 ms
content-background.png
136 ms
header.png
137 ms
logo.png
190 ms
blank.png
174 ms
icon-inscripciones.png
188 ms
img1.jpg
264 ms
img2.jpg
326 ms
img4.jpg
349 ms
mapa-igema.jpg
364 ms
management.jpg
348 ms
contabilidad_finanzas.jpg
351 ms
gestion_comercial.jpg
407 ms
direccion_operaciones.jpg
435 ms
marketing.jpg
434 ms
empresa_familiar.jpg
437 ms
direccion_estrategica.jpg
451 ms
gestion_deportiva.jpg
487 ms
recursos_humanos.jpg
521 ms
logo-estudio.png
520 ms
mymalog2.png
523 ms
translateelement.css
65 ms
main.js
126 ms
16a.png
454 ms
search-box.png
459 ms
menuBackground.png
478 ms
menutop-daddy.png
520 ms
left-bottom-shadow.png
519 ms
right-bottom-shadow.png
521 ms
showcase-background.png
542 ms
left-bottom-shadow-small.png
547 ms
right-bottom-shadow-small.png
559 ms
module-gradient.png
604 ms
universal-gradient.png
604 ms
inscripcion-online.jpg
608 ms
toTopBackground.png
592 ms
continue_button.png
597 ms
0ihfXUL2emPh0ROJezvraD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
35 ms
_xyN3apAT_yRRDeqB3sPRg.woff
36 ms
element_main.js
39 ms
translate_24dp.png
30 ms
l
48 ms
googlelogo_color_42x16dp.png
25 ms
igema.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
igema.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
igema.net SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
ES
ES
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Igema.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Spanish is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Igema.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
igema.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of IGEMA. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: