Report Summary

  • 88

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    90% of other websites

  • 63

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 28% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

imfrayedknot.com

imfrayedknot.com

Page Load Speed

9.3 sec in total

First Response

2.2 sec

Resources Loaded

6.6 sec

Page Rendered

519 ms

imfrayedknot.com screenshot

About Website

Visit imfrayedknot.com now to see the best up-to-date Imfrayedknot content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about imfrayedknot.com

This domain may be for sale!

Visit imfrayedknot.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Imfrayedknot.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.2 sec and then it took 7.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

imfrayedknot.com performance score

88

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

94/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value1.6 s

99/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.5 s

98/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value240 ms

86/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.193

64/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.8 s

89/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.imfrayedknot.com

2170 ms

webfont.js

65 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

93 ms

Defaults.css

206 ms

styles.css

156 ms

Our browser made a total of 94 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (85 requests) were addressed to the original Imfrayedknot.com, 3% (3 requests) were made to S.gravatar.com and 1% (1 request) were made to Ajax.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Imfrayedknot.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 3.0 MB (69%)

Content Size

4.3 MB

After Optimization

1.3 MB

In fact, the total size of Imfrayedknot.com main page is 4.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. CSS take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 74.4 kB

  • Original 87.2 kB
  • After minification 85.0 kB
  • After compression 12.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 74.4 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 71.8 kB

  • Original 882.3 kB
  • After minification 810.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Imfrayedknot images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 584.9 kB

  • Original 844.9 kB
  • After minification 827.0 kB
  • After compression 260.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 584.9 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-90%

Potential reduce by 2.3 MB

  • Original 2.5 MB
  • After minification 2.4 MB
  • After compression 249.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Imfrayedknot.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 2.3 MB or 90% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 71 (76%)

Requests Now

93

After Optimization

22

The browser has sent 93 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Imfrayedknot. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 50 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 23 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

imfrayedknot.com accessibility score

63

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

imfrayedknot.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

High

Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools

SEO Factors

imfrayedknot.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Imfrayedknot.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Imfrayedknot.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Imfrayedknot. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: