1.8 sec in total
264 ms
1.1 sec
388 ms
Welcome to in-sight.io homepage info - get ready to check In Sight best content for United Kingdom right away, or after learning these important things about in-sight.io
Agile dashboards for project managers, development teams and executives. We help you ship quality software on time by integrating with Pivotal Tracker.
Visit in-sight.ioWe analyzed In-sight.io page load time and found that the first response time was 264 ms and then it took 1.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
in-sight.io performance score
264 ms
75 ms
114 ms
112 ms
261 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 3% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original In-sight.io, 76% (25 requests) were made to D1gkl80l70vmwj.cloudfront.net and 9% (3 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (350 ms) relates to the external source D1gkl80l70vmwj.cloudfront.net.
Page size can be reduced by 599.7 kB (41%)
1.5 MB
880.5 kB
In fact, the total size of In-sight.io main page is 1.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 714.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 16.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 16.2 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 93.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, In Sight needs image optimization as it can save up to 93.0 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 357.9 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 357.9 kB or 63% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 132.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. In-sight.io needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 132.5 kB or 76% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 4 (13%)
31
27
The browser has sent 31 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of In Sight. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 5 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.in-sight.io
264 ms
website-ec976e19ab30face50bf476bc16a283e.css
75 ms
website-8ea92f4a4a45e92bc717f05fe981d9b6.js
114 ms
insight_logo_with_name-81884b1de182c82cfe07b6f4d5d18a48.png
112 ms
pivotal_small-a55c59e500b58743668930e08e0967d3.png
261 ms
pivotal_big-1019e6953b859357d148d82ee8eedc33.png
183 ms
jira_big-21dd12d6a05f4b9cff768920c4ad7b03.png
183 ms
ssl_lock-3e9b4dea4eb0aedba32f519067c883ee.png
184 ms
home_bg-d29130a0666f3487f3ebd98bc3674229.jpg
201 ms
circle-01174009c27c461390e2c0ff87a10dc5.png
185 ms
adobe-4ef27275f796651ca8ca1b56c1889dc5.png
184 ms
box-cd310f60bcbe2a18ba9bfe20442574c8.png
259 ms
groupon-76f016469920ba9c38b0d90bf7e56f60.png
200 ms
samasource-e9eb5acef8b9004450fb81b03bcf90b9.png
275 ms
virtualhold-019ff3300940122c0429e3d8cb039178.png
259 ms
on_time-d85e676d7fe179472cd9c1930fa0bf4c.png
258 ms
velocity-3e3c81d3ae987cef29553b2d9058d411.png
256 ms
quality-34525ae1c7ea4ca0a1f95ca08dc5bab6.png
309 ms
workflow-15d966464f96af6e7ea01bc1cc5ac92e.png
311 ms
communicate-12e9a8a42b47892cae8f16f094da0a83.jpg
323 ms
secure-41cfd23f4a3fb68d7f0aa318e0d8db14.png
302 ms
customizable-9218141444024b8b07dec57b3d1757ed.png
290 ms
adelaide-1aec59b78c8d257346b1b11c2354cecf.jpg
323 ms
simon_keefe-4748424846ec05c290db3a1a801e9d34.jpg
336 ms
kris_lander-901ff1fdf0cd686133480fb2795e76d7.jpg
350 ms
analytics.js
34 ms
analytics.min.js
296 ms
collect
27 ms
fontawesome-webfont-4cf99f3f729e4aef5941c25bfe7aeb96.woff
65 ms
mixpanel-2-latest.min.js
129 ms
collect
5 ms
28 ms
nr-885.min.js
46 ms
in-sight.io SEO score
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise In-sight.io can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that In-sight.io main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
in-sight.io
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of In Sight. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: