26.1 sec in total
2.6 sec
22.9 sec
564 ms
Click here to check amazing Indigital content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about indigital.md
This is a default index page for a new domain.
Visit indigital.mdWe analyzed Indigital.md page load time and found that the first response time was 2.6 sec and then it took 23.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
indigital.md performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
Value0.6 s
100/100
25%
Value0.8 s
100/100
10%
Value0 ms
100/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value0.6 s
100/100
10%
2596 ms
36 ms
353 ms
502 ms
357 ms
Our browser made a total of 89 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 43% of them (38 requests) were addressed to the original Indigital.md, 11% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 8% (7 requests) were made to Scontent.xx.fbcdn.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.2 sec) relates to the external source Ournet-analytics.com.
Page size can be reduced by 466.5 kB (53%)
883.0 kB
416.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Indigital.md main page is 883.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 324.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 140.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 140.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 43.0 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Indigital needs image optimization as it can save up to 43.0 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 202.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 202.5 kB or 62% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 80.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Indigital.md needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 80.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 47 (58%)
81
34
The browser has sent 81 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Indigital. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 13 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
indigital.md
2596 ms
gpt.js
36 ms
language-selector.css
353 ms
style.css
502 ms
nextgen_gallery_related_images.css
357 ms
css-front.css
352 ms
polls-css.css
354 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.5.pack.css
388 ms
indigital.md
1284 ms
jquery.js
908 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
561 ms
ajax.js
561 ms
frame_event_publisher.js
563 ms
swfobject.js
639 ms
general.js
642 ms
most-shared-posts.css
640 ms
sitepress.js
688 ms
css
76 ms
plusone.js
275 ms
pubads_impl_83.js
69 ms
container.html
73 ms
shortcodes.css
585 ms
custom.css
588 ms
top20md.js
20209 ms
polls-js.js
530 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.5.pack.js
550 ms
jquery.easing.pack.js
666 ms
jquery.mousewheel.pack.js
676 ms
ga.js
58 ms
watch.js
55 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
91 ms
__utm.gif
58 ms
logo_indigital2.jpg
1770 ms
ico-search.png
1761 ms
facebook_32.png
777 ms
twitter_32.png
1319 ms
google+_32.png
1760 ms
vk_32.png
1761 ms
slideshare_32.png
2124 ms
rss_32.png
1760 ms
vatra.jpg
2977 ms
NTA1MG5vc3RhcnR1cC12aXNh.jpg
2237 ms
NTA1MG5vYW5kcm9pZC1ibG9nLWltYWdlLTE=.png
2049 ms
NTA1MG5vNDUzMTM2MzAwN19jYThkNGVmMmI0X3o=.jpg
2220 ms
NTA1MG5vZ3lib24=.jpg
2033 ms
NTA1MG5vd3d3UHV6emxlLTMwMHgzMDA=.jpg
2220 ms
public.png
2312 ms
%D0%91%D0%B5%D0%B7-%D0%B8%D0%BC%D0%B5%D0%BD%D0%B8-1.jpg
2670 ms
all.js
1268 ms
ads
1023 ms
sDRi4fY9bOiJUbgq53yZCfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff
65 ms
QABk9IxT-LFTJ_dQzv7xpIbN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff
62 ms
count.js
1917 ms
03aPdn7fFF3H6ngCgAlQzBsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
295 ms
Foydq9xJp--nfYIx2TBz9QFhaRv2pGgT5Kf0An0s4MM.woff
1282 ms
likebox.php
1080 ms
expansion_embed.js
80 ms
2747370303816635478
527 ms
abg.js
674 ms
m_js_controller.js
699 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
391 ms
osd.js
386 ms
favicon
653 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
569 ms
4zvF1Y0eZKv.css
624 ms
FrSU6IlfEX1.css
644 ms
SRSW8M763HA.js
702 ms
ullQFyhrQFI.js
773 ms
y97Ig99UVTs.js
770 ms
KHAtULXOQuz.js
772 ms
129 ms
xd_arbiter.php
481 ms
xd_arbiter.php
661 ms
x_button_blue2.png
281 ms
s
371 ms
318010_468070016564207_2073060727_n.png
221 ms
485775_344970042207539_345386177_n.jpg
264 ms
12042630_572309216267552_6960800001651050591_n.jpg
351 ms
12247034_10203653839145786_4363973436871332198_n.jpg
351 ms
12821365_1205475106152448_2845341907305037148_n.jpg
284 ms
1982321_10203742609100428_5295697567716964974_n.jpg
316 ms
12341147_1692560494312675_1897110257704007232_n.jpg
350 ms
wL6VQj7Ab77.png
92 ms
1JLnMyDN79z.png
87 ms
VXcANLwwL5J.js
37 ms
i8XO-4kv8i7.js
45 ms
activeview
19 ms
__utm.gif
23 ms
48 ms
indigital.md accessibility score
indigital.md best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
indigital.md SEO score
EN
RO
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Indigital.md can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed Romanian language. Our system also found out that Indigital.md main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
indigital.md
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Indigital. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: