Tools & Wizards About Us
informationdesign.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 81

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    87% of other websites

  • 84

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 57% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 77

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    36% of websites

informationdesign.org

InfoDesign.25 | Hand-picked since 1997

Page Load Speed

8.3 sec in total

First Response

2.8 sec

Resources Loaded

4.8 sec

Page Rendered

647 ms

informationdesign.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Info Rmation Design content for Netherlands. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about informationdesign.org

InfoDesign: Hand-picked since 1997 - Sharing knowledge is better than having it

Visit informationdesign.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Informationdesign.org page load time and found that the first response time was 2.8 sec and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

informationdesign.org performance score

81

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.9 s

88/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.0 s

49/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value4.2 s

78/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value150 ms

94/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.039

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.9 s

88/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.informationdesign.org

2826 ms

reset.css

169 ms

960gridsystemNG.css

257 ms

base_style.css

427 ms

art_pagestyle.css

173 ms

Our browser made a total of 23 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (17 requests) were addressed to the original Informationdesign.org, 17% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Informationdesign.org.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 164.3 kB (66%)

Content Size

249.5 kB

After Optimization

85.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Informationdesign.org main page is 249.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 137.9 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 42.5 kB

  • Original 53.2 kB
  • After minification 46.7 kB
  • After compression 10.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 6.5 kB, which is 12% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 42.5 kB or 80% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-30%

Potential reduce by 2.9 kB

  • Original 9.5 kB
  • After minification 6.6 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Info Rmation Design needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.9 kB or 30% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-56%

Potential reduce by 77.8 kB

  • Original 137.9 kB
  • After minification 135.9 kB
  • After compression 60.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 77.8 kB or 56% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 41.2 kB

  • Original 48.9 kB
  • After minification 29.7 kB
  • After compression 7.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Informationdesign.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 41.2 kB or 84% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 15 (68%)

Requests Now

22

After Optimization

7

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 22 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Info Rmation Design. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.informationdesign.org

www.informationdesign.org

2826 ms

reset.css

reset.css

169 ms

960gridsystemNG.css

960gridsystemNG.css

257 ms

base_style.css

base_style.css

427 ms

art_pagestyle.css

art_pagestyle.css

173 ms

subform.css

subform.css

172 ms

css

css

23 ms

css

css

34 ms

css

css

43 ms

css

css

43 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

544 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

168 ms

modernizr.min.js

modernizr.min.js

256 ms

searchtermhigh.js

searchtermhigh.js

170 ms

followhovering.js

followhovering.js

253 ms

jquery.color.js

jquery.color.js

254 ms

script.js

script.js

255 ms

twitter-bird-blue-on-white.png

twitter-bird-blue-on-white.png

338 ms

rss-logo.png

rss-logo.png

382 ms

search-icon.png

search-icon.png

87 ms

wordpress.png

wordpress.png

87 ms

ga.js

ga.js

30 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

12 ms

Accessibility Review

informationdesign.org accessibility score

84

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

Best Practices

informationdesign.org best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

informationdesign.org SEO score

77

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Informationdesign.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Informationdesign.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

informationdesign.org

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Info Rmation Design. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: