2.9 sec in total
67 ms
2.5 sec
392 ms
Visit integrationpoint.com now to see the best up-to-date Integrationpoint content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about integrationpoint.com
Streamline your global trade management process with trade compliance information and productivity tools that automate routine tasks, give you compliance confidence, and save time | by Thomson Reuters...
Visit integrationpoint.comWe analyzed Integrationpoint.com page load time and found that the first response time was 67 ms and then it took 2.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
integrationpoint.com performance score
67 ms
371 ms
931 ms
378 ms
953 ms
Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (39 requests) were addressed to the original Integrationpoint.com, 14% (8 requests) were made to Google.com and 7% (4 requests) were made to Platform.twitter.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (953 ms) belongs to the original domain Integrationpoint.com.
Page size can be reduced by 475.5 kB (28%)
1.7 MB
1.2 MB
In fact, the total size of Integrationpoint.com main page is 1.7 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 77.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 77.2 kB or 86% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 154.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Integrationpoint needs image optimization as it can save up to 154.8 kB or 12% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 142.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 142.4 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 101.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Integrationpoint.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 101.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (65%)
54
19
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Integrationpoint. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 19 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
integrationpoint.com
67 ms
www.integrationpoint.com
371 ms
ip-global-styles-min.css
931 ms
modernizr.custom.54303.js
378 ms
jquery-1.8.3.min.js
953 ms
rotator.min.js
300 ms
detect2.js
319 ms
jsapi
18 ms
gfeedfetcher.js
417 ms
idangerous.swiper-2.1.min.js
600 ms
classie.js
332 ms
slide-menus.js
485 ms
12 ms
mobile-min.css
148 ms
default+en.css
3 ms
default+en.I.js
12 ms
home-back-new2.jpg
649 ms
minus.png
128 ms
dark-trans-2.png
210 ms
menu-icon.png
130 ms
mobile-logo.png
147 ms
li.jpg
206 ms
t.jpg
247 ms
fb.jpg
292 ms
b.jpg
290 ms
google-plus.jpg
291 ms
weibo.jpg
340 ms
viadeo.jpg
336 ms
p.jpg
376 ms
yt.jpg
382 ms
ACEPromoSM3.jpg
468 ms
event-icon.png
393 ms
twitter-icon-side.png
451 ms
news-icon.png
452 ms
downloads-icon.png
456 ms
gtn-blog.png
476 ms
ftz-blog.png
545 ms
cem-blog.png
549 ms
roboto-light-webfont.woff
649 ms
widgets.js
15 ms
Gfeeds
541 ms
indicator.gif
448 ms
Gfeeds
659 ms
Gfeeds
280 ms
dc.js
52 ms
timeline.d11f7a3b3287fb94220e8ee6d03cc772.js
29 ms
loading2.gif
314 ms
up.png
421 ms
inpage_linkid.js
15 ms
syndication
100 ms
444571830758539264
132 ms
__utm.gif
23 ms
__utm.gif
19 ms
ga-audiences
42 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
3 ms
timeline.47ab5d19e8ed22531abcf4f86f3ae53a.light.ltr.css
5 ms
wgVvoDGw_normal.jpg
133 ms
jot
20 ms
tablet-min.css
355 ms
integrationpoint.com SEO score
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Integrationpoint.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Integrationpoint.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
integrationpoint.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Integrationpoint. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: