Report Summary

  • 59

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    75% of other websites

  • 76

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 43% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 76

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    35% of websites

Page Load Speed

1.5 sec in total

First Response

314 ms

Resources Loaded

768 ms

Page Rendered

408 ms

interchangebrokers.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Interchangebrokers content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about interchangebrokers.com

Visit interchangebrokers.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Interchangebrokers.com page load time and found that the first response time was 314 ms and then it took 1.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 20% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

interchangebrokers.com performance score

59

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.3 s

39/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value5.4 s

20/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.5 s

88/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value390 ms

69/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.113

86/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.3 s

73/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

interchangebrokers.com

314 ms

css

41 ms

style.css

27 ms

form.css

38 ms

owl.carousel.css

38 ms

Our browser made a total of 51 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 61% of them (31 requests) were addressed to the original Interchangebrokers.com, 16% (8 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 10% (5 requests) were made to Gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (314 ms) belongs to the original domain Interchangebrokers.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 359.6 kB (49%)

Content Size

729.0 kB

After Optimization

369.5 kB

In fact, the total size of Interchangebrokers.com main page is 729.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 387.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 11.0 kB

  • Original 14.6 kB
  • After minification 12.5 kB
  • After compression 3.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 2.1 kB, which is 14% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 11.0 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 20.0 kB

  • Original 251.1 kB
  • After minification 231.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Interchangebrokers images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 265.6 kB

  • Original 387.4 kB
  • After minification 369.5 kB
  • After compression 121.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 265.6 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 63.0 kB

  • Original 76.0 kB
  • After minification 57.9 kB
  • After compression 13.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Interchangebrokers.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 63.0 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (54%)

Requests Now

41

After Optimization

19

The browser has sent 41 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Interchangebrokers. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

interchangebrokers.com accessibility score

76

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

High

List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

interchangebrokers.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

interchangebrokers.com SEO score

76

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Interchangebrokers.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Interchangebrokers.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Interchangebrokers. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: