5.9 sec in total
597 ms
5.1 sec
253 ms
Welcome to intertype.com.au homepage info - get ready to check Intertype best content for Australia right away, or after learning these important things about intertype.com.au
Helping you take on the World without costing the Earth. Modern publishing and printing for the ultimate in sustainability.
Visit intertype.com.auWe analyzed Intertype.com.au page load time and found that the first response time was 597 ms and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
intertype.com.au performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value8.3 s
0/100
10%
Value18.8 s
0/100
25%
Value26.8 s
0/100
10%
Value1,850 ms
9/100
30%
Value0.322
36/100
15%
Value19.0 s
3/100
10%
597 ms
823 ms
484 ms
744 ms
977 ms
Our browser made a total of 110 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 46% of them (51 requests) were addressed to the original Intertype.com.au, 11% (12 requests) were made to Intertype.infusionsoft.com and 7% (8 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Intertype.com.au.
Page size can be reduced by 2.6 MB (77%)
3.3 MB
764.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Intertype.com.au main page is 3.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 58.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 58.7 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 2.0 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Intertype needs image optimization as it can save up to 2.0 MB or 89% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 484.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 484.7 kB or 49% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 68 (67%)
102
34
The browser has sent 102 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Intertype. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 47 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
intertype.com.au
597 ms
www.intertype.com.au
823 ms
1458336877index.css
484 ms
1458336876index.css
744 ms
1458336876index.css
977 ms
1458336877index.js
751 ms
jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js
751 ms
1458336877index.js
1203 ms
jquery.backstretch.min.js
724 ms
1458336877index.js
969 ms
jquery.fancybox-media.js
1037 ms
jquery.isotope.min.js
1038 ms
1458336877index.js
1038 ms
iframe-api-v1.js
54 ms
a7cd42d3e0089cf310400a82714872f0
350 ms
ubermenu.min.js
1342 ms
ubermenu.sticky.min.js
1343 ms
core.min.js
1344 ms
widget.min.js
1343 ms
accordion.min.js
1344 ms
jquery.form.min.js
1544 ms
scripts.js
1544 ms
jquery-retina.js
1543 ms
js
44 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1543 ms
analytics.js
30 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
1048 ms
ec.js
9 ms
linkid.js
16 ms
collect
25 ms
collect
49 ms
loader.js
130 ms
phone_vintage.png
1468 ms
search.png
145 ms
qee04tjtja
111 ms
email.png
1451 ms
fax.png
1453 ms
menu-divider.png
321 ms
facebook.png
484 ms
twitter.png
484 ms
googleplus.png
484 ms
youtube.png
485 ms
linkedin.png
487 ms
IntLogo540x107.png
1685 ms
page-title-shadow.png
709 ms
Articon60.png
711 ms
Printicon60.png
711 ms
Bindicon60.png
712 ms
Tabicon60.png
713 ms
CDDVD.png
930 ms
Fulfilicon60.png
934 ms
Logo-Zinfra-250x200px.png
1660 ms
Logo-YBR-250x200px.png
1904 ms
Logo-Transfield-250x200px.png
2154 ms
Logo-Skill-tech-250x200px.png
2128 ms
Logo-Seita-250x200px.png
2379 ms
Logo-SCC-250x200px.png
2379 ms
Logo-RACV-250x200px.png
2403 ms
Logo-Vic-Super-250x200px.png
2623 ms
11-yrs-300x281-pixels.png
2369 ms
iframe_shim
60 ms
E-v1.js
67 ms
APH4jr0uSos5wiut5cpjronF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
18 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
2527 ms
EFpQQyG9GqCrobXxL-KRMfEr6Hm6RMS0v1dtXsGir4g.ttf
20 ms
s-BiyweUPV0v-yRb-cjciC3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
156 ms
a7cd42d3e0089cf310400a82714872f0
370 ms
impl-1_22.js
148 ms
li-custom-image.png
2489 ms
iframe_shim
97 ms
icon_top.png
2358 ms
light-grey.jpg
2360 ms
gtm.js
58 ms
bg_direction_nav1.png
2279 ms
socialbar-v1.js
102 ms
conversion_async.js
48 ms
wcm
83 ms
lightbox_js.jsp
408 ms
lightbox_css.jsp
181 ms
anti_spam.jsp
181 ms
iFrameMagicServer.js
181 ms
getTrackingCode
181 ms
tweet_button.html
75 ms
in.js
56 ms
plusone.js
135 ms
collect
39 ms
100 ms
jot
130 ms
secureAnonymousFramework
25 ms
like.php
140 ms
share
73 ms
sprite_connect_v14.png
74 ms
69 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
19 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
35 ms
fastbutton
87 ms
postmessageRelay
52 ms
qeKvIRsJabD.js
45 ms
LVx-xkvaJ0b.png
33 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
33 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_1
12 ms
3193398744-postmessagerelay.js
51 ms
rpc:shindig_random.js
33 ms
cb=gapi.loaded_0
7 ms
content.js
54 ms
yahoo-dom-event.js
119 ms
lightbox.css
59 ms
mput
77 ms
container-min.js
106 ms
spacer.gif
53 ms
intertype.com.au accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Links do not have a discernible name
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
intertype.com.au best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
intertype.com.au SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Intertype.com.au can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Intertype.com.au main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
intertype.com.au
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Intertype. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: