3.9 sec in total
358 ms
3.3 sec
222 ms
Visit inudge.net now to see the best up-to-date Inudge content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about inudge.net
A pentatonic step sequenzer which produces relaxing sonal patterns. Also available in the complete sequenzing studio app on audiotool.com
Visit inudge.netWe analyzed Inudge.net page load time and found that the first response time was 358 ms and then it took 3.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
inudge.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
88/100
10%
Value2.9 s
80/100
25%
Value3.6 s
87/100
10%
Value153,310 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value175.6 s
0/100
10%
358 ms
299 ms
32 ms
94 ms
185 ms
Our browser made a total of 46 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Inudge.net, 50% (23 requests) were made to Audiotool.com and 26% (12 requests) were made to Tonematrix.audiotool.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (520 ms) relates to the external source Audiotool.com.
Page size can be reduced by 136.7 kB (68%)
202.3 kB
65.5 kB
In fact, the total size of Inudge.net main page is 202.3 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 177.8 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 13.1 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 13.1 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 118.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 118.4 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.3 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Inudge.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 5.3 kB or 72% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 13 (57%)
23
10
The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Inudge. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
inudge.net
358 ms
tonematrix.audiotool.com
299 ms
jquery.min.js
32 ms
jquery.flash.js
94 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
185 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
189 ms
tipsy.css
189 ms
underscore.js
188 ms
cular.js
191 ms
tipsy.js
191 ms
reset.css
276 ms
app.css
280 ms
chartbeat-cfg.js
279 ms
jquery.flash.js
233 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
233 ms
underscore.js
289 ms
tipsy.css
278 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
281 ms
cular.js
280 ms
tipsy.js
280 ms
reset.css
235 ms
liftAjax.js
276 ms
app.css
282 ms
chartbeat-cfg.js
281 ms
jquery.flash.js
417 ms
jquery.fancybox.js
520 ms
tipsy.css
397 ms
jquery.fancybox.css
400 ms
cular.js
407 ms
tipsy.js
403 ms
underscore.js
405 ms
reset.css
444 ms
liftAjax.js
406 ms
chartbeat-cfg.js
418 ms
app.css
411 ms
ga.js
32 ms
all.js
72 ms
no-flash.gif
106 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
58 ms
xd_arbiter.php
88 ms
xd_arbiter.php
147 ms
chartbeat.js
47 ms
tonematrix.audiotool.com
98 ms
xd_arbiter.php
72 ms
ping
19 ms
inudge.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
inudge.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
inudge.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Inudge.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Inudge.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
inudge.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Inudge. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: