10.4 sec in total
3.5 sec
6.1 sec
804 ms
Visit ioptimal.co.uk now to see the best up-to-date Ioptimal content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about ioptimal.co.uk
I consult on a range of digital marketing including search marketing, advertising & social to earn you more revenue from the web. Book a free consultation.
Visit ioptimal.co.ukWe analyzed Ioptimal.co.uk page load time and found that the first response time was 3.5 sec and then it took 6.9 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 80% of websites can load faster.
ioptimal.co.uk performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.5 s
2/100
10%
Value8.5 s
2/100
25%
Value17.8 s
0/100
10%
Value170 ms
93/100
30%
Value0.003
100/100
15%
Value11.1 s
20/100
10%
3487 ms
9 ms
179 ms
180 ms
56 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 89% of them (67 requests) were addressed to the original Ioptimal.co.uk, 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com and 4% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Ioptimal.co.uk.
Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (60%)
1.9 MB
744.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Ioptimal.co.uk main page is 1.9 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 681.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 31.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.5 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 57.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ioptimal needs image optimization as it can save up to 57.2 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 487.1 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 487.1 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 549.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ioptimal.co.uk needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 549.4 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (41%)
71
42
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ioptimal. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 16 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 15 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
ioptimal.co.uk
3487 ms
ga.js
9 ms
validationEngine.jquery.css
179 ms
styles.css
180 ms
css
56 ms
css
56 ms
css
57 ms
normalize.css
182 ms
wireframe.css
180 ms
main.css
642 ms
media.css
350 ms
custom-0490cb62d0.css
917 ms
highdpi.css
372 ms
style.css
371 ms
royalslider.css
463 ms
prettyPhoto.css
592 ms
jquery.js
797 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
569 ms
modernizr.js
653 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
682 ms
__utm.gif
12 ms
js_composer_front.css
943 ms
jquery.form.min.js
734 ms
scripts.js
733 ms
jquery.royalslider.js
1095 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
990 ms
plugins.js
1256 ms
main.js
1047 ms
dt-dev-code.js
1004 ms
js_composer_front.js
1165 ms
jquery.validationEngine.js
1347 ms
jquery.validationEngine-en.js
1188 ms
dt-contact-form.js
1223 ms
business.general-boxed-bg-image.png
399 ms
business.general-bg-image.png
451 ms
logo-mid-374x90.png
630 ms
ecommerce1.jpg
868 ms
business.stripes-stripe-1-bg-image.png
630 ms
easyjet.jpg
630 ms
cheapflights.jpg
632 ms
hmv.jpg
640 ms
legalandgeneral.jpg
663 ms
myparceldelivery.jpg
724 ms
johnlewis.jpg
760 ms
hotelscom.jpg
786 ms
galabingo.jpg
826 ms
lexisnexis.jpg
841 ms
yorknotes.jpg
904 ms
rspca.jpg
958 ms
omnicom.jpg
973 ms
wickes.jpg
994 ms
goodcareguide.jpg
1015 ms
dealzippy.jpg
1052 ms
eurotunnel.jpg
1085 ms
beatthatquote.jpg
1137 ms
anyjunk.jpg
1153 ms
systagenix.jpg
1173 ms
flightline.jpg
1198 ms
icon01.png
1197 ms
zN7GBFwfMP4uA6AR0HCoLQ.ttf
10 ms
Jzo62I39jc0gQRrbndN6nfesZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.ttf
11 ms
yAXhog6uK3bd3OwBILv_SKCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
11 ms
icon08.png
1201 ms
icon05.png
1242 ms
icon02.png
1255 ms
icon06.png
1232 ms
icon07.png
1159 ms
icon03.png
1156 ms
johnm-banner.jpg
1326 ms
jm-sig.png
1189 ms
soc-icons.png
1181 ms
business.stripes-stripe-2-bg-image.png
1346 ms
asseenin.gif
1185 ms
14540a6-50x50.jpg
977 ms
07d30ac-50x50.jpg
1061 ms
ioptimal.co.uk accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
List items (<li>) are not contained within <ul> or <ol> parent elements.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
ioptimal.co.uk SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ioptimal.co.uk can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Ioptimal.co.uk main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ioptimal.co.uk
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Ioptimal. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: