5.6 sec in total
983 ms
3 sec
1.7 sec
Click here to check amazing Wrede Interface Des Ign content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about wrede.interfacedesign.org
Notes from Prof. Oliver Wrede on Interface, Interaction and Information Design & more
Visit wrede.interfacedesign.orgWe analyzed Wrede.interfacedesign.org page load time and found that the first response time was 983 ms and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
wrede.interfacedesign.org performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.2 s
43/100
10%
Value4.4 s
40/100
25%
Value3.9 s
82/100
10%
Value90 ms
98/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value4.3 s
85/100
10%
983 ms
201 ms
205 ms
26 ms
297 ms
Our browser made a total of 107 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 25% of them (27 requests) were addressed to the original Wrede.interfacedesign.org, 20% (21 requests) were made to Pixel.wp.com and 19% (20 requests) were made to Linkedin.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Wrede.interfacedesign.org.
Page size can be reduced by 991.5 kB (44%)
2.3 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Wrede.interfacedesign.org main page is 2.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 913.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 116.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 116.6 kB or 84% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Wrede Interface Des Ign images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 477.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 477.7 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 396.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Wrede.interfacedesign.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 396.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 78 (80%)
97
19
The browser has sent 97 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Wrede Interface Des Ign. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 42 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
wrede.interfacedesign.org
983 ms
style.css
201 ms
widget.css
205 ms
css
26 ms
genericons.css
297 ms
jetpack.css
206 ms
jquery.js
324 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
291 ms
hoverIntent.js
390 ms
superfish.js
388 ms
supersubs.js
390 ms
thematic-dropdowns.js
392 ms
related.css
214 ms
photon.js
243 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
10 ms
gprofiles.js
57 ms
wpgroho.js
300 ms
wp-embed.min.js
304 ms
sharing.js
319 ms
e-201611.js
8 ms
reset.css
324 ms
typography.css
322 ms
2c-r-fixed.css
344 ms
images.css
395 ms
default.css
399 ms
plugins.css
415 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
156 ms
ga.js
118 ms
60735314
646 ms
-Hyn1Bgxm4Y
642 ms
iak101.jpg1.jpg
1149 ms
scientist.jpg
1371 ms
thumb_IMG_0050_1024-600x800.jpg
1475 ms
loading.gif
613 ms
printfriendly.js
541 ms
7m8l7TlFO-S3VkhHuR0at4bN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff
90 ms
12mE4jfMSBTmg-81EiS-YRsxEYwM7FgeyaSgU71cLG0.woff
519 ms
t6Nd4cfPRhZP44Q5QAjcC4bN6UDyHWBl620a-IRfuBk.woff
536 ms
Hgo13k-tfSpn0qi1SFdUfT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
535 ms
vzIUHo9z-oJ4WgkpPOtg1_esZW2xOQ-xsNqO47m55DA.woff
535 ms
d-6IYplOFocCacKzxwXSOD8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
534 ms
Genericons.svg
753 ms
8AAnjaY2BgYGQAgosrjpwF0ZcUq9bCaABTzgdAAAA=
20 ms
__utm.gif
541 ms
kA5Horw_SOE
530 ms
FC5FbmsH4fw
623 ms
hovercard.css
488 ms
services.css
527 ms
share
689 ms
g.gif
488 ms
share
721 ms
share
809 ms
share
818 ms
share
892 ms
share
891 ms
share
890 ms
share
889 ms
share
890 ms
share
995 ms
share
993 ms
share
891 ms
share
893 ms
share
991 ms
share
990 ms
share
989 ms
share
989 ms
share
1001 ms
share
1132 ms
share
1004 ms
kHGAnK-vn_g
561 ms
jG66A2I1DC8
665 ms
Zx9neangV6w
559 ms
ci-yB6EgVW4
559 ms
g.gif
462 ms
g.gif
462 ms
g.gif
462 ms
g.gif
462 ms
g.gif
462 ms
g.gif
473 ms
g.gif
473 ms
g.gif
472 ms
g.gif
473 ms
g.gif
474 ms
g.gif
474 ms
g.gif
542 ms
g.gif
542 ms
g.gif
495 ms
g.gif
542 ms
g.gif
542 ms
g.gif
510 ms
g.gif
555 ms
g.gif
555 ms
g.gif
130 ms
player.js
272 ms
player.css
264 ms
ga.js
65 ms
vuid.min.js
264 ms
www-embed-player-vflfNyN_r.css
125 ms
www-embed-player.js
145 ms
__utm.gif
121 ms
fBnyGA8Aionz5086-mElmoOSPUuyQ1M9Un647_EjucU.js
185 ms
ad_status.js
189 ms
2UX7WLTfW3W8TclTUvlFyQ.woff
220 ms
RxZJdnzeo3R5zSexge8UUT8E0i7KZn-EPnyo3HZu7kw.woff
221 ms
proxy.html
65 ms
421792571.jpg
297 ms
5442724_60x60.jpg
211 ms
wrede.interfacedesign.org accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
<object> elements do not have alternate text
wrede.interfacedesign.org best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Issues were logged in the Issues panel in Chrome Devtools
wrede.interfacedesign.org SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Wrede.interfacedesign.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Wrede.interfacedesign.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
wrede.interfacedesign.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Wrede Interface Des Ign. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: