Report Summary

  • 45

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    64% of other websites

  • 79

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 48% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 79

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    40% of websites

Page Load Speed

5.7 sec in total

First Response

98 ms

Resources Loaded

1.9 sec

Page Rendered

3.7 sec

jennepper.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to jennepper.com homepage info - get ready to check Jennepper best content right away, or after learning these important things about jennepper.com

Visit jennepper.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jennepper.com page load time and found that the first response time was 98 ms and then it took 5.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jennepper.com performance score

45

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.6 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.5 s

54/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value540 ms

55/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.013

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value7.5 s

48/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jennepper.com

98 ms

www.jennepper.com

179 ms

webfont.js

50 ms

3375562265-css_bundle_v2.css

75 ms

authorization.css

122 ms

Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 2% of them (2 requests) were addressed to the original Jennepper.com, 26% (25 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 7% (7 requests) were made to Im1.shutterfly.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (685 ms) relates to the external source Ads.blogherads.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 194.4 kB (28%)

Content Size

694.0 kB

After Optimization

499.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Jennepper.com main page is 694.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 409.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 157.0 kB

  • Original 187.6 kB
  • After minification 185.4 kB
  • After compression 30.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 157.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 24.4 kB

  • Original 409.2 kB
  • After minification 384.8 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jennepper images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-15%

Potential reduce by 13.0 kB

  • Original 89.2 kB
  • After minification 87.3 kB
  • After compression 76.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 13.0 kB or 15% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 6 B

  • Original 8.0 kB
  • After minification 8.0 kB
  • After compression 8.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jennepper.com has all CSS files already compressed.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 39 (45%)

Requests Now

86

After Optimization

47

The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jennepper. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 26 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

jennepper.com accessibility score

79

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Best Practices

jennepper.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

jennepper.com SEO score

79

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't use legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jennepper.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Jennepper.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jennepper. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: