7.6 sec in total
2.2 sec
5.1 sec
253 ms
Welcome to jig.in homepage info - get ready to check Jig best content for India right away, or after learning these important things about jig.in
This website is for sale! jig.in is your first and best source for all of the information you’re looking for. From general topics to more of what you would expect to find here, jig.in has it all. We h...
Visit jig.inWe analyzed Jig.in page load time and found that the first response time was 2.2 sec and then it took 5.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.
jig.in performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.9 s
52/100
10%
Value3.4 s
67/100
25%
Value3.8 s
83/100
10%
Value370 ms
71/100
30%
Value0.84
4/100
15%
Value7.1 s
52/100
10%
2236 ms
730 ms
498 ms
514 ms
1032 ms
Our browser made a total of 75 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 37% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Jig.in, 9% (7 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net and 8% (6 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (2.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Jig.in.
Page size can be reduced by 501.2 kB (39%)
1.3 MB
776.4 kB
In fact, the total size of Jig.in main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 55% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 547.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 66.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 66.8 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 14.6 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jig images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 251.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 251.7 kB or 56% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 168.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jig.in needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 168.0 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 51 (72%)
71
20
The browser has sent 71 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jig. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 31 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 9 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
jig.in
2236 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
730 ms
style.css
498 ms
anthemes-shortcodes.css
514 ms
style.css
1032 ms
default.css
808 ms
responsive.css
724 ms
font-awesome.min.css
37 ms
jetpack.css
1237 ms
jquery.js
1533 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
977 ms
tie.js
973 ms
adsbygoogle.js
9 ms
underscore.min.js
610 ms
daves-wordpress-live-search.min.js
747 ms
excanvas.compiled.js
760 ms
spinners.min.js
821 ms
photon.js
880 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
5 ms
gprofiles.js
54 ms
wpgroho.js
989 ms
masonry.pkgd.min.js
1010 ms
custom.js
1012 ms
jquery.infinitescroll.js
1335 ms
wp-embed.min.js
1146 ms
e-201611.js
5 ms
searchicon.png
17 ms
bg-header.png
445 ms
rsz_2screen_shot_2016-01-29_at_90459_pm.png
251 ms
btn_search.png
247 ms
1450937418_pphc_1.jpg
1556 ms
Lustria-Regular.svg
601 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
11 ms
ca-pub-2356334442439050.js
50 ms
zrt_lookup.html
41 ms
show_ads_impl.js
58 ms
ads
323 ms
osd.js
10 ms
ads
312 ms
ads
292 ms
ads
297 ms
ads
292 ms
hovercard.css
33 ms
services.css
60 ms
arrow-down.png
257 ms
m_js_controller.js
56 ms
abg.js
83 ms
g.gif
13 ms
0_yOXfyb1q.jpg
254 ms
a.gif
57 ms
bcs0
112 ms
creative_add_on.js
158 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
98 ms
9219332660106672783
97 ms
favicon
98 ms
nessie_icon_tiamat_white.png
55 ms
s
25 ms
x_button_blue2.png
11 ms
Tqng9ngJVK4Gqvh3e602hP-HqlN49KFEUSDtmrOPmWo.js
3 ms
surly.js
71 ms
dvtp_src.js
139 ms
ba.html
10 ms
4.gif
20 ms
2532.js
10 ms
dvtp_src_internal26.js
31 ms
t2tv7.html
130 ms
visit.js
50 ms
avs5639.js
31 ms
event.gif
61 ms
event.jpg
28 ms
box_19_top-right.png
18 ms
ci.png
21 ms
ajax-loader.gif
255 ms
ui
35 ms
activeview
17 ms
jig.in accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
jig.in best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Page has valid source maps
jig.in SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jig.in can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Jig.in main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
jig.in
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Jig. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: