Report Summary

  • 36

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    56% of other websites

  • 80

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 50% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 86

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    60% of websites

jls.com

MediaLocate, Inc. and Japanese Language Services, Inc. Merge! - MediaLocate

Page Load Speed

4.1 sec in total

First Response

1.6 sec

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

280 ms

jls.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Jls content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about jls.com

Translation services Silicon Valley. If you are looking for an interpreter to handle any translation that you may need or software localization JLS is it.

Visit jls.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Jls.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.6 sec and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

jls.com performance score

36

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value4.1 s

21/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value4.9 s

29/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value8.6 s

17/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value990 ms

27/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.081

94/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value9.9 s

27/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

jls.com

1647 ms

jls.css

29 ms

superfish.css

22 ms

jquery-1.4.4.min.js

51 ms

superfish.js

22 ms

Our browser made a total of 34 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (25 requests) were addressed to the original Jls.com, 12% (4 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 6% (2 requests) were made to Dandb.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.6 sec) belongs to the original domain Jls.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 107.9 kB (50%)

Content Size

214.5 kB

After Optimization

106.7 kB

In fact, the total size of Jls.com main page is 214.5 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 152.4 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 9.6 kB

  • Original 14.5 kB
  • After minification 13.7 kB
  • After compression 4.9 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 9.6 kB or 67% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 53 B

  • Original 32.5 kB
  • After minification 32.4 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Jls images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-57%

Potential reduce by 86.2 kB

  • Original 152.4 kB
  • After minification 151.5 kB
  • After compression 66.2 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 86.2 kB or 57% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 12.0 kB

  • Original 15.2 kB
  • After minification 11.3 kB
  • After compression 3.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Jls.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (10%)

Requests Now

30

After Optimization

27

The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Jls. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

jls.com accessibility score

80

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

jls.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

jls.com SEO score

86

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Jls.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Jls.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Jls. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: