Tools & Wizards About Us
kasefacare.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 85

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    89% of other websites

  • 53

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 22% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 83

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    46% of websites

kasefacare.com

kasefacare.com

Page Load Speed

9 sec in total

First Response

3 sec

Resources Loaded

5.8 sec

Page Rendered

249 ms

kasefacare.com screenshot

About Website

Visit kasefacare.com now to see the best up-to-date Kasefacare content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about kasefacare.com

Visit kasefacare.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Kasefacare.com page load time and found that the first response time was 3 sec and then it took 6.1 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 75% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

kasefacare.com performance score

85

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value2.7 s

59/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

78/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value2.7 s

96/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value30 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.167

71/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value2.8 s

97/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

kasefacare.com

2958 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

85 ms

style.php

859 ms

lambda.css

161 ms

style.css

222 ms

Our browser made a total of 59 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 98% of them (58 requests) were addressed to the original Kasefacare.com, 2% (1 request) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3 sec) belongs to the original domain Kasefacare.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 481.9 kB (35%)

Content Size

1.4 MB

After Optimization

890.2 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Kasefacare.com main page is 1.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 820.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 24.6 kB

  • Original 31.2 kB
  • After minification 29.2 kB
  • After compression 6.6 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.6 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-6%

Potential reduce by 51.9 kB

  • Original 820.6 kB
  • After minification 768.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Kasefacare images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-74%

Potential reduce by 264.7 kB

  • Original 355.9 kB
  • After minification 307.9 kB
  • After compression 91.3 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 264.7 kB or 74% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-86%

Potential reduce by 140.7 kB

  • Original 164.3 kB
  • After minification 127.5 kB
  • After compression 23.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Kasefacare.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 140.7 kB or 86% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (63%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

21

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Kasefacare. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 17 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

kasefacare.com

kasefacare.com

2958 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

85 ms

style.php

style.php

859 ms

lambda.css

lambda.css

161 ms

style.css

style.css

222 ms

layout.css

layout.css

160 ms

formalize.css

formalize.css

163 ms

superfish.css

superfish.css

172 ms

prettyPhoto.css

prettyPhoto.css

240 ms

tipTip.css

tipTip.css

237 ms

lambda_widgets.css

lambda_widgets.css

238 ms

font-awesome.css

font-awesome.css

242 ms

adipoli.css

adipoli.css

296 ms

nonverblaster.css

nonverblaster.css

309 ms

css

css

20 ms

flexslider.css

flexslider.css

308 ms

jquery.id.moover-1.7.5.css

jquery.id.moover-1.7.5.css

312 ms

tinymce.css

tinymce.css

318 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

474 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

407 ms

swfobject.js

swfobject.js

390 ms

camera.min.js

camera.min.js

452 ms

jquery.mobile.customized.min.js

jquery.mobile.customized.min.js

390 ms

cameraslider.css

cameraslider.css

994 ms

jquery.easing.js

jquery.easing.js

1001 ms

superfish.js

superfish.js

993 ms

jquery.formalize.min.js

jquery.formalize.min.js

992 ms

jquery.isotope.min.js

jquery.isotope.min.js

999 ms

jquery.tipTip.minified.js

jquery.tipTip.minified.js

999 ms

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

jquery.prettyPhoto.js

1083 ms

like.js.php

like.js.php

1821 ms

jquery.corner.js

jquery.corner.js

1087 ms

jquery.adipoli.min.js

jquery.adipoli.min.js

1084 ms

nonverblaster.js

nonverblaster.js

1086 ms

app.js

app.js

1085 ms

jquery.flexslider.min.js

jquery.flexslider.min.js

1171 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

1171 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

1189 ms

slider.init.php

slider.init.php

1821 ms

5.png

5.png

342 ms

fb.png

fb.png

390 ms

tw.png

tw.png

391 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

462 ms

home_f9.jpg

home_f9.jpg

690 ms

Home_banner_02.png

Home_banner_02.png

635 ms

arrow-right.gif

arrow-right.gif

432 ms

contact-adress.png

contact-adress.png

507 ms

contact-phone.png

contact-phone.png

503 ms

contact-email.png

contact-email.png

587 ms

blog-line.png

blog-line.png

587 ms

footer-contact-adress.png

footer-contact-adress.png

659 ms

footer-contact-phone.png

footer-contact-phone.png

659 ms

footer-contact-email.png

footer-contact-email.png

678 ms

select_arrow.gif

select_arrow.gif

69 ms

alpha.png

alpha.png

100 ms

camera_skins.png

camera_skins.png

216 ms

camera-loader.gif

camera-loader.gif

154 ms

slide-011.jpg

slide-011.jpg

391 ms

slide-010.jpg

slide-010.jpg

458 ms

Accessibility Review

kasefacare.com accessibility score

53

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

kasefacare.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

kasefacare.com SEO score

83

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Kasefacare.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Kasefacare.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

kasefacare.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Kasefacare. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: