2.1 sec in total
428 ms
1.5 sec
217 ms
Visit lafayettepolygraph.com now to see the best up-to-date Lafayette Polygraph content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lafayettepolygraph.com
Visit lafayettepolygraph.comWe analyzed Lafayettepolygraph.com page load time and found that the first response time was 428 ms and then it took 1.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
lafayettepolygraph.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value10.1 s
0/100
25%
Value7.6 s
26/100
10%
Value640 ms
47/100
30%
Value0.244
51/100
15%
Value12.2 s
15/100
10%
428 ms
314 ms
181 ms
330 ms
249 ms
Our browser made a total of 31 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 74% of them (23 requests) were addressed to the original Lafayettepolygraph.com, 26% (8 requests) were made to Limef.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (812 ms) relates to the external source Limef.com.
Page size can be reduced by 106.7 kB (22%)
492.0 kB
385.3 kB
In fact, the total size of Lafayettepolygraph.com main page is 492.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 15% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 353.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 19.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 5.5 kB, which is 22% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 19.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 5.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lafayette Polygraph images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 49.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 49.7 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 31.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lafayettepolygraph.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 31.9 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 10 (33%)
30
20
The browser has sent 30 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lafayette Polygraph. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lafayettepolygraph.com
428 ms
jquery-1.4.2.min.js
314 ms
jquery.tinycarousel.min.js
181 ms
new.css
330 ms
btns.css
249 ms
external.js
156 ms
lx11-screen.jpg
793 ms
pouches.jpg
699 ms
converus.jpg
683 ms
flyer-bkg.jpg
812 ms
5k-bkg.jpg
722 ms
LX5000-505-125.jpg
444 ms
LX4000-505-125.jpg
472 ms
76877p-125.jpg
478 ms
npc-125.jpg
480 ms
mybkg.jpg
91 ms
li-corplink.png
56 ms
css3buttons_backgrounds.png
137 ms
css3buttons_icons.png
81 ms
liclogo-poly.png
92 ms
home.png
77 ms
products.png
109 ms
ddbkg.png
140 ms
support.png
144 ms
about.png
167 ms
lx5000-ad.jpg
337 ms
fb-sprite.png
164 ms
tw-sprite.png
199 ms
footbkg.png
204 ms
newprint.css
85 ms
btns-print.css
94 ms
lafayettepolygraph.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
lafayettepolygraph.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
lafayettepolygraph.com SEO score
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lafayettepolygraph.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lafayettepolygraph.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lafayettepolygraph.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lafayette Polygraph. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: