4.5 sec in total
1.8 sec
2.6 sec
180 ms
Visit lifejottings.org now to see the best up-to-date Lifejottings content and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lifejottings.org
Bluehost - Top rated web hosting provider - Free 1 click installs For blogs, shopping carts, and more. Get a free domain name, real NON-outsourced 24/7 support, and superior speed. web hosting provide...
Visit lifejottings.orgWe analyzed Lifejottings.org page load time and found that the first response time was 1.8 sec and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
lifejottings.org performance score
1753 ms
75 ms
130 ms
132 ms
34 ms
Our browser made a total of 60 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 72% of them (43 requests) were addressed to the original Lifejottings.org, 8% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 5% (3 requests) were made to Fonts.googleapis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.8 sec) belongs to the original domain Lifejottings.org.
Page size can be reduced by 495.9 kB (61%)
811.0 kB
315.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Lifejottings.org main page is 811.0 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 357.6 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 47.4 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 47.4 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 929 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifejottings images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 244.2 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 244.2 kB or 68% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 203.4 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifejottings.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 203.4 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 46 (85%)
54
8
The browser has sent 54 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifejottings. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 16 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lifejottings.org
1753 ms
style.css
75 ms
ssf.css
130 ms
frontend.popup.css
132 ms
animate.min.css
34 ms
checkbox.min.css
131 ms
css
39 ms
css
50 ms
form-theme-red.min.css
137 ms
shortcodes.css
142 ms
genericons.css
204 ms
jetpack.css
193 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css
202 ms
page_templates.css
199 ms
jquery.js
264 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
218 ms
common.js
282 ms
core.js
281 ms
frontend.popup.js
284 ms
et_shortcodes_frontend.js
285 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
17 ms
gprofiles.js
58 ms
wpgroho.js
325 ms
superfish.js
345 ms
jquery.flexslider-min.js
368 ms
jquery.fitvids.js
334 ms
custom.js
369 ms
jquery.easing-1.3.pack.js
377 ms
jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js
382 ms
et-ptemplates-frontend.js
399 ms
sharing.js
422 ms
e-201611.js
13 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
384 ms
analytics.js
19 ms
collect
87 ms
shadow.png
172 ms
twitter.png
173 ms
rss.png
190 ms
facebook.png
192 ms
search_btn.png
228 ms
Life-Jottings-Logo-300x105.png
231 ms
images-2.jpg
288 ms
womensday-159527_960x360.jpg
327 ms
top-shadow.png
367 ms
middle-shadow.png
268 ms
shadow2.png
302 ms
widget-red-bullet.png
303 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
26 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
43 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
56 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xD1GzwQ5qF9DNzkQQVRhJ4g.ttf
55 ms
gk5FxslNkTTHtojXrkp-xJhsE6jcpsD2oq89kgohWx0.ttf
55 ms
css
33 ms
hovercard.css
39 ms
services.css
53 ms
subscribe-300x275.jpg
349 ms
Life-Jottings-Logo.png
226 ms
g.gif
19 ms
left-arrow.png
205 ms
right-arrow.png
183 ms
lifejottings.org SEO score
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifejottings.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifejottings.org main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifejottings.org
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lifejottings. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: