6.3 sec in total
1.5 sec
3.2 sec
1.6 sec
Click here to check amazing Life S Candy Jar content for United States. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lifescandyjar.com
A Chicago Based Style and Beauty Blog by Rachel Barkules
Visit lifescandyjar.comWe analyzed Lifescandyjar.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 4.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
lifescandyjar.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value6.4 s
2/100
10%
Value7.6 s
4/100
25%
Value8.2 s
20/100
10%
Value790 ms
37/100
30%
Value0.172
69/100
15%
Value16.2 s
6/100
10%
1504 ms
31 ms
42 ms
245 ms
30 ms
Our browser made a total of 97 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 23% of them (22 requests) were addressed to the original Lifescandyjar.com, 11% (11 requests) were made to Images.rewardstyle.com and 9% (9 requests) were made to Scontent.cdninstagram.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.5 sec) belongs to the original domain Lifescandyjar.com.
Page size can be reduced by 429.7 kB (12%)
3.5 MB
3.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Lifescandyjar.com main page is 3.5 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 85% of websites need less resources to load and that’s why Accessify’s recommendations for optimization and resource minification can be helpful for this project. Images take 2.8 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 108.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 108.6 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 16.4 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Life S Candy Jar images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 87.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 87.6 kB or 41% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 217.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifescandyjar.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 217.1 kB or 68% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 36 (42%)
86
50
The browser has sent 86 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Life S Candy Jar. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.lifescandyjar.com
1504 ms
cloudflare.min.js
31 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
42 ms
styles.css
245 ms
style.css
30 ms
icons.css
208 ms
public.css
145 ms
style.css
32 ms
jquery.bxslider.css
37 ms
slicknav.css
38 ms
font-awesome.min.css
10 ms
responsive.css
62 ms
css
36 ms
css
52 ms
css
63 ms
instag-slider.css
48 ms
style.css
49 ms
mimi.css
48 ms
jquery-ui.css
51 ms
jetpack.css
53 ms
jquery.min.js
50 ms
jquery-ui.js
24 ms
jquery.easing.min.js
26 ms
load.sumome.com
336 ms
js.php
146 ms
pinit.js
22 ms
adsbygoogle.js
25 ms
plugin.css
23 ms
devicepx-jetpack.js
23 ms
e-201611.js
24 ms
js.php
176 ms
RjgO7rYTmqiVp7vzi-Q5UaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
11 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzPOEPOIfcPv-fZ-WyMUtx48.ttf
22 ms
ga.js
45 ms
life.png
44 ms
chambray-dress.jpg
157 ms
JBB_7048.jpg
249 ms
JBB_6894.jpg
42 ms
10693488_1396755887297853_1334884978_n.jpg
257 ms
JBB_6935.jpg
153 ms
JBB_6911.jpg
40 ms
JBB_6866.jpg
41 ms
JBB_7198.jpg
39 ms
Rachel-chair-5-of-9-2.jpg
39 ms
914242_559793457520176_742020467_n.jpg
39 ms
350.gif
193 ms
JBB_6477.jpg
240 ms
12446062_202947656738884_1949639565_n.jpg
457 ms
12825744_1066287946763289_616841906_n.jpg
499 ms
12783195_243321702672227_137328800_n.jpg
500 ms
12825878_1694880937433726_1875373484_n.jpg
456 ms
12783180_1699256556959355_85303130_n.jpg
498 ms
12826053_562505010582121_1150679942_n.jpg
498 ms
12751182_1529239150710648_13126366_n.jpg
535 ms
12717005_1764378167118406_1166729672_n.jpg
578 ms
JBB_6136.jpg
235 ms
spring-break.jpg
246 ms
shopthepost.js
38 ms
pinit_main.js
104 ms
Y_TKV6o8WovbUd3m_X9aAA.ttf
24 ms
bH7276GfdCjMjApa_dkG6aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
24 ms
3IFMwfRa07i-auYR-B-zNYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
23 ms
rEy5tGc5HdXy56Xvd4f3I306qf9KHRHwsVx7iw5MXmY.ttf
24 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
24 ms
a5QZnvmn5amyNI-t2BMkWCtfYakCkPqOMDce0h_3gD8.ttf
78 ms
4j4TR-EfnvCt43InYpUNDCxQL91WRy8t8mPvAX_dIgA.ttf
77 ms
twitter_feed_icons_sprite.png
51 ms
__utm.gif
40 ms
ca-pub-6394218023970284.js
111 ms
zrt_lookup.html
320 ms
show_ads_impl.js
59 ms
collect
331 ms
ads
399 ms
osd.js
196 ms
2600.png
222 ms
1465203.html
23 ms
1f334.png
154 ms
g.gif
34 ms
img
97 ms
scroller-arrows.png
34 ms
350.gif
29 ms
img
125 ms
img
121 ms
img
82 ms
img
111 ms
img
73 ms
img
153 ms
img
192 ms
img
172 ms
img
241 ms
img
233 ms
5196283228337587005
36 ms
abg.js
38 ms
m_js_controller.js
49 ms
googlelogo_color_112x36dp.png
32 ms
s
26 ms
x_button_blue2.png
25 ms
lifescandyjar.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
lifescandyjar.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
lifescandyjar.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifescandyjar.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lifescandyjar.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lifescandyjar.com
Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Life S Candy Jar. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: