Tools & Wizards About Us
lifeweightloss.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 68

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 33% of websites

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

lifeweightloss.com

Page Load Speed

4.7 sec in total

First Response

939 ms

Resources Loaded

3.1 sec

Page Rendered

732 ms

lifeweightloss.com screenshot

About Website

Visit lifeweightloss.com now to see the best up-to-date Lifeweightloss content for India and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lifeweightloss.com

Visit lifeweightloss.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lifeweightloss.com page load time and found that the first response time was 939 ms and then it took 3.8 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lifeweightloss.com performance score

0

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value0

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value0

0/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0

0/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.131

81/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value0

0/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.lifeweightloss.com

939 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

133 ms

style.css

92 ms

css

29 ms

font-awesome.min.css

141 ms

Our browser made a total of 27 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Lifeweightloss.com, 15% (4 requests) were made to Pagead2.googlesyndication.com and 15% (4 requests) were made to Googleads.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (939 ms) belongs to the original domain Lifeweightloss.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 208.8 kB (34%)

Content Size

608.4 kB

After Optimization

399.6 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lifeweightloss.com main page is 608.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 50% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 253.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-72%

Potential reduce by 39.9 kB

  • Original 55.7 kB
  • After minification 53.0 kB
  • After compression 15.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 39.9 kB or 72% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 0 B

  • Original 253.2 kB
  • After minification 253.2 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lifeweightloss images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-50%

Potential reduce by 118.4 kB

  • Original 238.1 kB
  • After minification 236.4 kB
  • After compression 119.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 118.4 kB or 50% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 50.4 kB

  • Original 61.4 kB
  • After minification 45.4 kB
  • After compression 11.0 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lifeweightloss.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 50.4 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 14 (61%)

Requests Now

23

After Optimization

9

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 23 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lifeweightloss. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 15 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

www.lifeweightloss.com

www.lifeweightloss.com

939 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

133 ms

style.css

style.css

92 ms

css

css

29 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

141 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

202 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

133 ms

adsbygoogle.js

adsbygoogle.js

12 ms

masonry.min.js

masonry.min.js

89 ms

jquery.masonry.min.js

jquery.masonry.min.js

98 ms

masonry-setting.js

masonry-setting.js

272 ms

search-toggle.js

search-toggle.js

272 ms

jquery.fitvids.js

jquery.fitvids.js

273 ms

fitvids-setting.js

fitvids-setting.js

273 ms

skip-link-focus-fix.js

skip-link-focus-fix.js

275 ms

jquery.bxslider.min.js

jquery.bxslider.min.js

274 ms

cropped-fresh-fruits-vegetables-2419.jpg

cropped-fresh-fruits-vegetables-2419.jpg

746 ms

ca-pub-3532774985357951.js

ca-pub-3532774985357951.js

267 ms

zrt_lookup.html

zrt_lookup.html

467 ms

show_ads_impl.js

show_ads_impl.js

73 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

419 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

419 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

538 ms

ads

ads

676 ms

osd.js

osd.js

133 ms

ads

ads

338 ms

ads

ads

252 ms

Accessibility Review

lifeweightloss.com accessibility score

68

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

SEO Factors

lifeweightloss.com SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lifeweightloss.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else), while the claimed language is English. Our system also found out that Lifeweightloss.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lifeweightloss.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lifeweightloss. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: