11.7 sec in total
2.3 sec
9.2 sec
283 ms
Welcome to ligolab.com homepage info - get ready to check Ligo Lab best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about ligolab.com
# 1 Rated RCM & LIS Lab Software Only 5 Star Solution Integrates LIS Laboratory Information System & Revenue Cycle Management.
Visit ligolab.comWe analyzed Ligolab.com page load time and found that the first response time was 2.3 sec and then it took 9.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 85% of websites can load faster.
ligolab.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value3.5 s
33/100
10%
Value7.6 s
4/100
25%
Value9.7 s
11/100
10%
Value24,020 ms
0/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value34.9 s
0/100
10%
2299 ms
248 ms
99 ms
59 ms
421 ms
Our browser made a total of 67 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 90% of them (60 requests) were addressed to the original Ligolab.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Img.youtube.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (5.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Ligolab.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.3 MB (47%)
2.8 MB
1.5 MB
In fact, the total size of Ligolab.com main page is 2.8 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 30% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.5 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 38.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 38.8 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.1 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Ligo Lab needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.1 MB or 43% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 184.7 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 184.7 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 52.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Ligolab.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 52.9 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 17 (26%)
65
48
The browser has sent 65 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Ligo Lab. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 13 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.ligolab.com
2299 ms
style.css
248 ms
prettyPhoto.css
99 ms
noscript.css
59 ms
jquery.js
421 ms
jqueryslidemenu.js
167 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.js
168 ms
jquery.tools.tabs.min.js
164 ms
jquery.cycle.all.js
475 ms
functions.js
222 ms
cufon-yui.js
256 ms
TitilliumText14L_400.font.js
297 ms
global.min.js
322 ms
shadowbox-jquery.min.js
321 ms
shadowbox.min.js
356 ms
shadowbox.min.css
352 ms
reset.css
157 ms
jqueryslidemenu.css
158 ms
ga.js
162 ms
default.jpg
160 ms
default.jpg
197 ms
minimalist11.png
150 ms
phone-dark.png
149 ms
linkedin.png
156 ms
youtube.png
152 ms
topwrapper.png
150 ms
mainwrapper.png
146 ms
bg-header.png
152 ms
logo.png
153 ms
topmenu.png
192 ms
bg-dropdown.png
155 ms
bg-slideshow.jpg
4989 ms
slide5.jpg
2231 ms
DB8BC742-3610-4943-B7334BD4A8290EFA.png
3828 ms
A42636D6-A685-4812-AC3C353CB21228DD.jpg
3202 ms
9A25F00B-3C44-4D1A-BAABD7CD64E4A8B9.jpg
2404 ms
18376E4C-3442-4911-9C564E65264445F9.jpg
1871 ms
bg-featureslist.jpg
5551 ms
feature-icon4.png
2794 ms
feature-icon1.png
3060 ms
feature-icon6.png
3293 ms
LIS-Modules.png
3566 ms
divider.jpg
5943 ms
bg-box2.png
3873 ms
8CF70164-42A0-4067-B504BC1455441534_medium.jpg
4091 ms
E035D296-CC79-4D4A-9ADACF4B64860DEF_medium.jpg
4295 ms
EC458998-6DAD-4351-84DB6ABD384B7BC3_medium.jpg
4341 ms
B4862B59-0731-406A-A4BAF3DD7B711660_medium.jpg
4560 ms
canon_main_logo.png
4777 ms
logo_dymo.png
4779 ms
aperio.png
4987 ms
ventana.png
5154 ms
lumenera_logo.png
5126 ms
home.png
5293 ms
phone.png
5294 ms
mail.png
5420 ms
newsletter.png
5300 ms
bottomwrapper.png
5455 ms
transparent.png
5484 ms
button_white_right.png
5548 ms
button_white_left.png
5560 ms
slidenav-active.png
5575 ms
slidenav.png
5605 ms
__utm.gif
13 ms
widget_v2.135.js
10 ms
avatar_simple_visitor.png
95 ms
aL63HcygAAVYuCCsAAA==
1 ms
ligolab.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Internationalization and localization
These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.
Impact
Issue
<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Some elements have a [tabindex] value greater than 0
ligolab.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
ligolab.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Ligolab.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Ligolab.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
ligolab.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Ligo Lab. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: