Tools & Wizards About Us
lit.org screenshot

Report Summary

  • 0

    Performance

  • 0

    Accessibility

  • 0

    Best Practices

  • 0

    SEO

lit.org

Page Load Speed

896 ms in total

First Response

64 ms

Resources Loaded

440 ms

Page Rendered

392 ms

lit.org screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lit content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lit.org

Writing resources, Internet resources related to writing, writers, publishing, epublishing, authors and more.

Visit lit.org

Key Findings

We analyzed Lit.org page load time and found that the first response time was 64 ms and then it took 832 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lit.org performance score

0

Network Requests Diagram

lit.org

64 ms

lit.js

32 ms

lit-default.css

31 ms

conversion.js

15 ms

trans.gif

64 ms

Our browser made a total of 22 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 68% of them (15 requests) were addressed to the original Lit.org, 9% (2 requests) were made to Googleadservices.com and 9% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (270 ms) relates to the external source Connect.facebook.net.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 76.8 kB (43%)

Content Size

177.8 kB

After Optimization

101.1 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lit.org main page is 177.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. HTML takes 67.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 59.5 kB

  • Original 67.3 kB
  • After minification 66.3 kB
  • After compression 7.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.5 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-8%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 58.3 kB
  • After minification 53.5 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lit images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-5%

Potential reduce by 1.8 kB

  • Original 40.2 kB
  • After minification 39.6 kB
  • After compression 38.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. This website has mostly compressed JavaScripts.

CSS Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 10.6 kB

  • Original 12.0 kB
  • After minification 7.4 kB
  • After compression 1.4 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lit.org needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 10.6 kB or 88% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 3 (16%)

Requests Now

19

After Optimization

16

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 19 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 4 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lit.org

lit.org

64 ms

lit.js

lit.js

32 ms

lit-default.css

lit-default.css

31 ms

conversion.js

conversion.js

15 ms

trans.gif

trans.gif

64 ms

all.js

all.js

270 ms

50 ms

ga.js

ga.js

57 ms

square.gif

square.gif

12 ms

litbg.jpg

litbg.jpg

14 ms

bg.jpg

bg.jpg

14 ms

trans.gif

trans.gif

22 ms

logo.jpg

logo.jpg

20 ms

page_header_home.jpg

page_header_home.jpg

21 ms

menu_main.jpg

menu_main.jpg

19 ms

squarer-blue.gif

squarer-blue.gif

20 ms

menu_read.jpg

menu_read.jpg

19 ms

menu_write.jpg

menu_write.jpg

23 ms

menu_respond.jpg

menu_respond.jpg

23 ms

96 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

16 ms

39 ms

SEO Factors

lit.org SEO score

0

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lit.org can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Lit.org main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

lit.org

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lit. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: