5.7 sec in total
1.1 sec
3.9 sec
646 ms
Visit litigationfutures.com now to see the best up-to-date Litigation Futures content for United Kingdom and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about litigationfutures.com
The free guide to costs, funding and the Jackson reforms
Visit litigationfutures.comWe analyzed Litigationfutures.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.1 sec and then it took 4.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 70% of websites can load faster.
litigationfutures.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value9.6 s
0/100
10%
Value16.5 s
0/100
25%
Value11.2 s
5/100
10%
Value650 ms
46/100
30%
Value0.256
48/100
15%
Value20.3 s
2/100
10%
1090 ms
344 ms
187 ms
180 ms
181 ms
Our browser made a total of 93 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 82% of them (76 requests) were addressed to the original Litigationfutures.com, 8% (7 requests) were made to Dh2noy1s15q79.cloudfront.net and 2% (2 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.2 sec) belongs to the original domain Litigationfutures.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.0 MB (43%)
2.4 MB
1.3 MB
In fact, the total size of Litigationfutures.com main page is 2.4 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 142.8 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 142.8 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 142.5 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Litigation Futures needs image optimization as it can save up to 142.5 kB or 13% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 680.8 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 680.8 kB or 67% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 51.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Litigationfutures.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 51.1 kB or 86% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 30 (33%)
92
62
The browser has sent 92 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Litigation Futures. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 25 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.litigationfutures.com
1090 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
344 ms
shadowbox.css
187 ms
extras.css
180 ms
youtube_simplegallery.css
181 ms
legalfutures.css
406 ms
jquery.js
422 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
311 ms
animatedcollapse.js
337 ms
jquery.validate.min.js
402 ms
additional-methods.min.js
504 ms
jquery.cycle.all.min.js
453 ms
jquery.easing.1.3.js
447 ms
cufon-yui.js
515 ms
impact_400.font.js
525 ms
sbc-style.css
519 ms
wop.css
535 ms
addthis_widget.js
12 ms
output.css
477 ms
3a7c52941f850f8b72a84d4c66a78565.js
650 ms
jquery.adrotate.dyngroup.js
644 ms
jquery.adrotate.clicktracker.js
643 ms
slideshow.js
645 ms
menu.js
645 ms
featuredcontentglider.js
647 ms
jquery.tabSlideOut.v1.3.js
655 ms
funders-scroll.js
658 ms
wp-embed.min.js
662 ms
ga.js
80 ms
590 ms
main-bk.jpg
553 ms
bk.png
556 ms
LOGO-RGB.jpg
587 ms
1596_Omnia_Web-Banner-Amend_final.gif
599 ms
twitter.png
587 ms
rss.png
587 ms
arrow-search.png
588 ms
nav-bar-no-lines.jpg
589 ms
ticker.png
591 ms
Litigation-Future-Banner-400x60-ARAG.jpg
593 ms
bar.jpg
592 ms
RCJ-portrait-2-150x150.jpg
597 ms
button.jpg
593 ms
Supreme-Court-sign-2-150x150.jpg
597 ms
Sue-Nash-1-150x150.jpg
598 ms
funders.png
598 ms
ISO-Dec-14.jpg
733 ms
bar-home.jpg
602 ms
Gary-Knight-1-150x150.jpg
603 ms
Robins-Costs-200-x-120.jpg
670 ms
Laird-2015-2001.jpg
667 ms
news.png
665 ms
AugustaVentures200x200.jpg
713 ms
Harmans-200-x-200.jpg
749 ms
Laird-2015-200x200.jpg
810 ms
linkedInSmall.png
582 ms
widgets.js
506 ms
ISO-200-x-2002.jpg
942 ms
__utm.gif
368 ms
DAS-LawAssist-200-x-200.jpg
680 ms
Amberis-200x200.jpg
702 ms
JohnMHayes-200x200.jpg
739 ms
Litigation-Costs-Services-200x200.jpg
768 ms
Omnia-200-x-2001.jpg
809 ms
Keystone-200x200.jpg
829 ms
Just-Costs-200-x-200.jpg
1245 ms
inCase2002.jpg
1240 ms
CRIF-200x200.jpg
934 ms
Burcher-Jennings-200x200.jpg
933 ms
Zebra-LC-200x200.jpg
932 ms
TM-Costings-2013.jpg
931 ms
Burford-200x200.jpg
901 ms
Robins-Costs-200-x-200.jpg
901 ms
Kain-Knight-200-x-200.jpg
899 ms
BottCo-200-x-200.jpg
901 ms
Costs-Master-200-x-200.jpg
899 ms
Eclipse2014-200x200.jpg
895 ms
Linetime-200x200.jpg
897 ms
ARAG-200x200-logo.jpg
897 ms
Temple-200x200.jpg
904 ms
11705_DAS_LawAssist_Litigation_Futures_Banner_Ad_200x200px_June15.gif
932 ms
200x200-Animated-Law-Society-Eclipse-Dec-151.gif
902 ms
;i=11;r=http~3A~2F~2Fwww~2Elitigationfutures~2Ecom~2F
304 ms
logo.png;v=5e8779f36e805b75267e365170197249
31 ms
40 ms
25 ms
27 ms
42 ms
33 ms
37 ms
nr-885.min.js
33 ms
9afd525bb3
52 ms
layers.e5ea973510bf60b3db41.js
18 ms
litigationfutures.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[role] values are not valid
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Tables and lists
These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
litigationfutures.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
Page has valid source maps
litigationfutures.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Litigationfutures.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Litigationfutures.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
litigationfutures.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Litigation Futures. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: