1.7 sec in total
139 ms
1.4 sec
138 ms
Visit livetool.ru now to see the best up-to-date Livetool content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about livetool.ru
Школа PHP Программирования - систематизированный видео курс PHP, HTML, MySQL, JS с нуля с домашними заданиями и индивидуальными консультациями
Visit livetool.ruWe analyzed Livetool.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 139 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.
livetool.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.1 s
99/100
10%
Value1.1 s
100/100
25%
Value1.6 s
100/100
10%
Value130 ms
96/100
30%
Value0.084
93/100
15%
Value5.2 s
74/100
10%
139 ms
10 ms
21 ms
10 ms
62 ms
Our browser made a total of 53 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 66% of them (35 requests) were addressed to the original Livetool.ru, 21% (11 requests) were made to Vk.com and 8% (4 requests) were made to Reformal.ru. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (423 ms) relates to the external source Vk.com.
Page size can be reduced by 389.9 kB (30%)
1.3 MB
911.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Livetool.ru main page is 1.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 993.2 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 10.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 10.2 kB or 70% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 150.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Livetool needs image optimization as it can save up to 150.7 kB or 15% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 188.5 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 188.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 40.6 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livetool.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 40.6 kB or 79% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 12 (24%)
49
37
The browser has sent 49 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Livetool. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 9 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
livetool.ru
139 ms
mainchrome.html
10 ms
stylechrome.css
21 ms
style-slider.css
10 ms
jquery.min.js
62 ms
billy.carousel.jquery.min.js
7 ms
demonstration.css
11 ms
openapi.js
382 ms
tab6.js
154 ms
bgh.png
68 ms
bghead.png
57 ms
logo.png
58 ms
vk.png
60 ms
iesmall.png
59 ms
strelka.png
21 ms
iesmall.png
61 ms
iesmall.png
57 ms
yaicon.png
62 ms
iesmall.png
62 ms
iesmall.png
60 ms
menu.png
58 ms
profile.png
63 ms
events.png
72 ms
status.png
63 ms
search.png
68 ms
conf.png
66 ms
logobot.png
63 ms
bg.png
63 ms
install.png
56 ms
bgbot.png
56 ms
menuicon.png
54 ms
profileicon.png
57 ms
eventsicon.png
58 ms
statusicon.png
60 ms
conficon.png
59 ms
searchicon.png
58 ms
upload.gif
128 ms
widget_like.php
275 ms
hit
260 ms
7688f5685f7701e97daa5497d3d9c745.png
78 ms
st.php
169 ms
ahover.png
52 ms
menuiconh.png
38 ms
widget_logo.jpg
141 ms
livetool%7CaHR0cDovL2xpdmV0b29sLnJ1L21haW5jaHJvbWUuaHRtbA==%7C
161 ms
loader_nav19127_3.js
128 ms
lite.css
132 ms
lite.js
423 ms
lang3_0.js
254 ms
widgets.css
261 ms
xdm.js
262 ms
al_like.js
263 ms
like_widget.png
129 ms
livetool.ru accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
livetool.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
livetool.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livetool.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Livetool.ru main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
livetool.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Livetool. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: