3 sec in total
543 ms
2.2 sec
198 ms
Visit livetop.net now to see the best up-to-date Livetop content for Israel and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about livetop.net
بواسطة Livetop، كلّ ما يحتاج إليه الطلاب والمعلّمون معروض في بيئة تعليمية مفتوحة، مُدمجة ومميّزة تتيح لصناع القرار النهوض بمستوى أداء المعلمين والطلبة.
Visit livetop.netWe analyzed Livetop.net page load time and found that the first response time was 543 ms and then it took 2.4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.
livetop.net performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value5.0 s
10/100
10%
Value12.5 s
0/100
25%
Value8.5 s
17/100
10%
Value1,020 ms
26/100
30%
Value0.041
99/100
15%
Value12.2 s
15/100
10%
543 ms
36 ms
46 ms
295 ms
273 ms
Our browser made a total of 47 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Livetop.net, 36% (17 requests) were made to D2i2wahzwrm1n5.cloudfront.net and 11% (5 requests) were made to D35islomi5rx1v.cloudfront.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (561 ms) relates to the external source Secure.livetop.net.
Page size can be reduced by 923.1 kB (45%)
2.0 MB
1.1 MB
In fact, the total size of Livetop.net main page is 2.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.1 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 28.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.7 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 93.3 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Livetop needs image optimization as it can save up to 93.3 kB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 752.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 752.6 kB or 66% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 48.5 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livetop.net needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 48.5 kB or 78% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 29 (66%)
44
15
The browser has sent 44 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Livetop. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 7 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
secure.livetop.net
543 ms
css
36 ms
css
46 ms
jquery-latest.min.js
295 ms
jquery.cookie.js
273 ms
TG_LoginLTR.css
361 ms
WebResource.axd
377 ms
Window.css
69 ms
Window.Metro.css
76 ms
ComboBox.css
70 ms
ComboBox.MetroTouch.css
82 ms
Telerik.Web.UI.WebResource.axd
467 ms
Core.js
71 ms
Ajax.js
71 ms
jQuery.js
74 ms
jQueryPlugins.js
72 ms
Draggable.js
72 ms
TouchScrollExtender.js
72 ms
Resizable.js
73 ms
PopupScripts.js
75 ms
ShortCutManagerScripts.js
74 ms
AnimationFramework.js
75 ms
AnimationScripts.js
76 ms
RadWindowScripts.js
78 ms
OverlayScript.js
76 ms
NavigationScripts.js
78 ms
OData.js
77 ms
RadComboBoxScripts.js
80 ms
ClassicView.js
78 ms
WebResource.axd
259 ms
contrast.png
88 ms
textsize.png
88 ms
radActionsSprite.png
44 ms
errorMessage-rtl.png
87 ms
successMessage-rtl.png
88 ms
warningMessage-rtl.png
93 ms
login-preload.png
79 ms
login-bg.png
151 ms
HomePageLogo.png
165 ms
breakingSeperator.png
153 ms
HomePageFooterLogo.png
170 ms
background2.png
561 ms
FZa_MODmDkR9DTu5jHSnSS3USBnSvpkopQaUR-2r7iU.ttf
26 ms
bCA-uDdUx6nTO8SjzCLXvYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf
37 ms
nr-1044.min.js
14 ms
background2.png
378 ms
6be9bea408
92 ms
livetop.net accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
livetop.net best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript
livetop.net SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
AR
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livetop.net can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Arabic is used on the page, and it does not match the claimed English language. Our system also found out that Livetop.net main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
livetop.net
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Livetop. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: