5.9 sec in total
1.7 sec
3.8 sec
332 ms
Click here to check amazing Livguard content for India. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about livguard.com
Shop for the best range of inverters, batteries and energy storage solutions for your home with Livguard
Visit livguard.comWe analyzed Livguard.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.7 sec and then it took 4.2 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.
livguard.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
17/100
10%
Value9.2 s
1/100
25%
Value9.8 s
10/100
10%
Value610 ms
49/100
30%
Value0.347
32/100
15%
Value12.3 s
15/100
10%
1706 ms
698 ms
1273 ms
135 ms
134 ms
Our browser made a total of 79 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 91% of them (72 requests) were addressed to the original Livguard.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.7 sec) belongs to the original domain Livguard.com.
Page size can be reduced by 1.5 MB (47%)
3.1 MB
1.6 MB
In fact, the total size of Livguard.com main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 25% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 27.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 27.7 kB or 76% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 11.8 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Livguard images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 1.0 MB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.0 MB or 74% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 400.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Livguard.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 400.1 kB or 84% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 37 (55%)
67
30
The browser has sent 67 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Livguard. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 22 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
livguard.com
1706 ms
mouse-over.css
698 ms
form.css
1273 ms
prettyPhoto.css
135 ms
wp-video-lightbox.css
134 ms
hs-faq.css
136 ms
jquery-ui.css
20 ms
jquery-ui.css
207 ms
style.css
202 ms
widgetize_menu_frontend_style.css
209 ms
advwidgets_styles.css
205 ms
square.css
270 ms
css
44 ms
style.css
482 ms
jquery.js
349 ms
jquery-migrate.min.js
348 ms
jquery.prettyPhoto.min.js
429 ms
video-lightbox.js
425 ms
jquery-ui.js
615 ms
custom-faq.js
509 ms
widgetize_menu_frontend_script.js
552 ms
underscore.min.js
600 ms
backbone.min.js
628 ms
core.min.js
666 ms
widget.min.js
684 ms
position.min.js
701 ms
menu.min.js
739 ms
wp-a11y.min.js
749 ms
autocomplete.min.js
777 ms
visualsearch.min.js
854 ms
main-pro.js
806 ms
jquery.min.js
32 ms
navigation.js
764 ms
wp-embed.min.js
792 ms
wp-emoji-release.min.js
75 ms
body_bg.jpg
84 ms
sachintop.png
90 ms
logo.png
87 ms
drp_arw.png
89 ms
roughtTxt.png
218 ms
livguardBanner.jpg
297 ms
akshay.png
166 ms
wordclass_text.png
158 ms
tez_logo-new.png
164 ms
tez-inverlife_sachin.png
245 ms
sachin-mobile-acc.png
294 ms
stablizes-images.png
301 ms
homevehicle.jpg
246 ms
comercialtractor.png
352 ms
tez_home.jpg
326 ms
stabhome.jpg
328 ms
accehome.jpg
367 ms
livguardabt.png
369 ms
presslogo.png
370 ms
toogle_icon.png
395 ms
automotive-icon-over.png
394 ms
tez-inveter_icon.png
415 ms
mobile-acc_icon.png
431 ms
stablizer_icon.png
434 ms
u-WUoqrET9fUeobQW7jkRaCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf
52 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzNqQynqKV_9Plp7mupa0S4g.ttf
52 ms
MyriadProBold.woff
429 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
453 ms
MyriadProRegular.woff
465 ms
OpenSansBold.woff
487 ms
tez-inverter-banner.jpg
554 ms
mobile-acce-banner.jpg
933 ms
stablizer-banner.jpg
504 ms
rightfirstgrf.png
517 ms
scndgraph.png
546 ms
abt_livbg.png
559 ms
fb.png
576 ms
twitter.png
584 ms
analytics.js
11 ms
collect
10 ms
OpenSansRegular.woff
570 ms
OpenSansSemibold.woff
573 ms
intagram.png
571 ms
youtube.png
581 ms
livguard.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-hidden="true"] elements contain focusable descendents
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
livguard.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
livguard.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Crawling and Indexing
To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.
Impact
Issue
Links are not crawlable
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Livguard.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Livguard.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
livguard.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Livguard. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: