Tools & Wizards About Us
lookingglassphoto.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 82

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 54% of websites

  • 75

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    36% of websites

  • 93

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    84% of websites

lookingglassphoto.com

Looking Glass Photo & Camera - Looking Glass Photo & Camera

Page Load Speed

5.9 sec in total

First Response

1.9 sec

Resources Loaded

3.6 sec

Page Rendered

420 ms

lookingglassphoto.com screenshot

About Website

Visit lookingglassphoto.com now to see the best up-to-date Looking Glass Photo content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lookingglassphoto.com

<h1>The premier camera and photography store in the San Francisco Bay Area.</h1>

Visit lookingglassphoto.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lookingglassphoto.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 4 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 65% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lookingglassphoto.com performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.2 s

43/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.5 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.3 s

58/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value1,980 ms

8/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.7 s

36/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lookingglassphoto.com

1910 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

150 ms

frontend_style.css

155 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

156 ms

settings.css

189 ms

Our browser made a total of 76 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 59% of them (45 requests) were addressed to the original Lookingglassphoto.com, 12% (9 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 8% (6 requests) were made to Px.owneriq.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (1.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Lookingglassphoto.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 812.6 kB (36%)

Content Size

2.2 MB

After Optimization

1.4 MB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lookingglassphoto.com main page is 2.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.2 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-84%

Potential reduce by 80.0 kB

  • Original 95.1 kB
  • After minification 89.0 kB
  • After compression 15.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 80.0 kB or 84% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 44.6 kB

  • Original 1.2 MB
  • After minification 1.2 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Looking Glass Photo images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-69%

Potential reduce by 438.7 kB

  • Original 634.6 kB
  • After minification 631.1 kB
  • After compression 195.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 438.7 kB or 69% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 249.2 kB

  • Original 306.4 kB
  • After minification 260.3 kB
  • After compression 57.1 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lookingglassphoto.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 249.2 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 32 (56%)

Requests Now

57

After Optimization

25

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 57 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Looking Glass Photo. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 20 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 14 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lookingglassphoto.com

lookingglassphoto.com

1910 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

wp-emoji-release.min.js

150 ms

frontend_style.css

frontend_style.css

155 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.css

156 ms

settings.css

settings.css

189 ms

css

css

30 ms

css

css

43 ms

css

css

51 ms

wpinstagram.css

wpinstagram.css

148 ms

settings.css

settings.css

171 ms

css

css

51 ms

genericons.css

genericons.css

182 ms

style.css

style.css

180 ms

jquery.js

jquery.js

415 ms

jquery-migrate.min.js

jquery-migrate.min.js

218 ms

jquery.mousewheel-3.0.4.pack.js

jquery.mousewheel-3.0.4.pack.js

240 ms

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js

jquery.fancybox-1.3.4.pack.js

257 ms

frontend_script.js

frontend_script.js

257 ms

jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js

jquery.themepunch.plugins.min.js

367 ms

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

jquery.themepunch.revolution.min.js

391 ms

lightbox.js

lightbox.js

347 ms

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

jquery.themepunch.tools.min.js

462 ms

jquery.themepunch.essential.min.js

jquery.themepunch.essential.min.js

501 ms

font-awesome.min.css

font-awesome.min.css

5 ms

style.css

style.css

481 ms

bootstrap.min.css

bootstrap.min.css

7 ms

comment-reply.min.js

comment-reply.min.js

110 ms

functions.js

functions.js

109 ms

wp-embed.min.js

wp-embed.min.js

207 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

58 ms

lgproper.png

lgproper.png

435 ms

Nikkor-Resource-Center.jpg

Nikkor-Resource-Center.jpg

909 ms

Thearon-Homepage.jpg

Thearon-Homepage.jpg

1068 ms

Photography-Classes.jpg

Photography-Classes.jpg

1069 ms

Shira-Bezalel-05.jpg

Shira-Bezalel-05.jpg

963 ms

Nikon-D500.jpg

Nikon-D500.jpg

761 ms

mzuiko-300mm-8.jpg

mzuiko-300mm-8.jpg

867 ms

EOS-80D-top-1.jpg

EOS-80D-top-1.jpg

1148 ms

MarioLGGallery.jpg

MarioLGGallery.jpg

1494 ms

Nikkor-24-70mm-1.jpg

Nikkor-24-70mm-1.jpg

1376 ms

Classes_Tout.jpg

Classes_Tout.jpg

1367 ms

eds-blog.jpg

eds-blog.jpg

1376 ms

footer-logo.png

footer-logo.png

434 ms

facebook.png

facebook.png

432 ms

flickr.png

flickr.png

127 ms

twitter.png

twitter.png

430 ms

googleplus.png

googleplus.png

128 ms

instagram.png

instagram.png

431 ms

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

glyphicons-halflings-regular.woff

74 ms

PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf

PKCRbVvRfd5n7BTjtGiFZMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf

73 ms

1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf

1ImRNPx4870-D9a1EBUdPMDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf

77 ms

JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaI8DdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf

JbtMzqLaYbbbCL9X6EvaI8DdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf

79 ms

xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12b8DdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf

xkvoNo9fC8O2RDydKj12b8DdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf

76 ms

CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T88DdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf

CcKI4k9un7TZVWzRVT-T88DdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf

75 ms

UAnF6lSK1JNc1tqTiG8pNALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf

UAnF6lSK1JNc1tqTiG8pNALUuEpTyoUstqEm5AMlJo4.ttf

82 ms

-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAricDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf

-_Ctzj9b56b8RgXW8FAricDdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf

81 ms

8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-k8DdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf

8KhZd3VQBtXTAznvKjw-k8DdSZkkecOE1hvV7ZHvhyU.ttf

80 ms

RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWCZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

RJMlAoFXXQEzZoMSUteGWCZ2oysoEQEeKwjgmXLRnTc.ttf

77 ms

collect

collect

329 ms

fontawesome-webfont.woff

fontawesome-webfont.woff

290 ms

linkid.js

linkid.js

284 ms

rlrct1.js

rlrct1.js

560 ms

lookin.js

lookin.js

275 ms

loader.gif

loader.gif

101 ms

revicons.woff

revicons.woff

125 ms

collect

collect

28 ms

84 ms

ep

ep

15 ms

ecc

ecc

29 ms

pixel

pixel

17 ms

pixel

pixel

14 ms

cm

cm

18 ms

getcookie

getcookie

69 ms

ermcm

ermcm

11 ms

Shira-Bezalel-05-320x200.jpg

Shira-Bezalel-05-320x200.jpg

231 ms

Thearon-Homepage-320x200.jpg

Thearon-Homepage-320x200.jpg

309 ms

Accessibility Review

lookingglassphoto.com accessibility score

82

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA IDs are not unique

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

lookingglassphoto.com best practices score

75

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

SEO Factors

lookingglassphoto.com SEO score

93

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have descriptive text

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lookingglassphoto.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Lookingglassphoto.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lookingglassphoto.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Looking Glass Photo. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: