19.2 sec in total
1.9 sec
11.7 sec
5.7 sec
Click here to check amazing Looktique content for Japan. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about looktique.com
Visit looktique.comWe analyzed Looktique.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.9 sec and then it took 17.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.
looktique.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.1 s
21/100
10%
Value6.0 s
13/100
25%
Value4.1 s
79/100
10%
Value800 ms
37/100
30%
Value0.078
95/100
15%
Value8.1 s
42/100
10%
1874 ms
17 ms
229 ms
450 ms
677 ms
Our browser made a total of 77 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Looktique.com, 3% (2 requests) were made to Gtc7.acecounter.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (4.2 sec) relates to the external source M.looktique.com.
Page size can be reduced by 2.3 MB (14%)
16.3 MB
14.0 MB
In fact, the total size of Looktique.com main page is 16.3 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 65% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 15.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 34.6 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 8.3 kB, which is 20% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 34.6 kB or 83% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 1.7 MB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Looktique needs image optimization as it can save up to 1.7 MB or 11% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.
Potential reduce by 453.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 453.3 kB or 71% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 201.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Looktique.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 201.0 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 35 (51%)
68
33
The browser has sent 68 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Looktique. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 21 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 10 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
index
1874 ms
font-awesome.min.css
17 ms
common.css
229 ms
style.css
450 ms
bootstrap.min.css
677 ms
ui_elements.css
445 ms
realway_style_mobile.css
445 ms
detail_modal.css
447 ms
comment.css
449 ms
paging.css
665 ms
kakao.min.js
524 ms
jquery.min.js
935 ms
jquery-ui.min.js
1138 ms
handlebars-v1.3.0.js
913 ms
breeze_common.js
669 ms
popup.js
885 ms
side_menu_control.js
892 ms
jquery.breeze.pagination.js
894 ms
jquery.breeze.list.js
1106 ms
comment.js
1115 ms
realway.js
1115 ms
front-layout.js
1137 ms
jquery.cookie.js
1152 ms
subscribe_pop_up.css
1326 ms
subscribe_popup.js
1335 ms
503_Insight_WebAnalytics.js
1342 ms
conversion.js
47 ms
wcslog.js
57 ms
wp_astg_2.0_mall.js
3020 ms
kakao.min.js
1085 ms
echo.js
226 ms
analytics.js
29 ms
logo.svg
224 ms
line.png
269 ms
fontawesome-webfont.woff
23 ms
m
1066 ms
gtc7.acecounter.com
653 ms
AceCounter_AW.js
811 ms
collect
14 ms
tracker.do
694 ms
collect
55 ms
ga-audiences
35 ms
gtc7.acecounter.com
398 ms
sendid
706 ms
wpc.php
1428 ms
lists
739 ms
f135eeeb2f478e536cb327f53205e49f.jpg
1996 ms
main_box_btn_off.png
271 ms
9546c3bf2e567b5e93f4a58bf9587d89.jpg
2218 ms
bfadb275b5e97391b56c4f81111c646f.jpg
2208 ms
4a5e9f5a4ee3db8426c738418c8c3b0a.jpg
1778 ms
53fe4458e96b45a05662bff60a607963.jpg
1773 ms
7531af1f25fa8145ba4e2a24b3f4c898.jpg
2487 ms
72345b9c01ac8842d00dd19b39fe7368.jpg
2442 ms
421e1d62ecab74000d0110d22640687e.jpg
2671 ms
0f2b3ac23941099b120ab628d4035135.jpg
2879 ms
6c772ecf56f7d2e7921778a8068c3182.jpg
2871 ms
dbabdcfe673bf49652c6c7a915e98dcd.jpg
2882 ms
a5a17776cafda511622a497e24a7470a.jpg
3108 ms
a74b5eb3d5569b8b74d84ed217a923c1.jpg
3154 ms
1c10cb151a85ebb42eb4e0992df38f7b.jpg
3118 ms
b58f3524ce867b3b4270bd9838d605d7.jpg
3534 ms
1f19a1be321959b87e324d8714145bf4.jpg
3328 ms
3699de7d23cf8c7c2d990e9d5ab46fab.jpg
3554 ms
59352aae69d1685dbe1b67098e698383.jpg
3557 ms
de85c1c70495ea3b3278f68828ce7c15.jpg
3565 ms
00cfce174c9e444377e9d01674509e3a.jpg
3822 ms
f4ef1333bbc902804cbff7ef69552055.jpg
3783 ms
9f0bee26e32b4d2634bb8da7b758535b.jpg
4194 ms
e8933bf7c8f5863ad9dd09be4285765f.jpg
3999 ms
c3b8980be9c0f52e7b1f4ceef7088b89.jpg
4003 ms
widerplanet.php
501 ms
pixel
18 ms
wpc.php
633 ms
pixel
15 ms
wpg.php
618 ms
wpp.php
523 ms
looktique.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Navigation
These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.
Impact
Issue
Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have a discernible name
looktique.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
User Experience
Impact
Issue
Serves images with low resolution
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
Browser errors were logged to the console
looktique.com SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
N/A
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Looktique.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Looktique.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
looktique.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Looktique. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: