Tools & Wizards About Us
lower-back-pain-toolkit.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 83

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    88% of other websites

  • 86

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 62% of websites

  • 92

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 75

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    32% of websites

lower-back-pain-toolkit.com

Page Load Speed

24.8 sec in total

First Response

1.3 sec

Resources Loaded

14.7 sec

Page Rendered

8.8 sec

lower-back-pain-toolkit.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Lower Back Pain Toolkit content for United Kingdom. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about lower-back-pain-toolkit.com

Written by a physiotherapist - clear information you can trust to help you manage lower back pain

Visit lower-back-pain-toolkit.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lower-back-pain-toolkit.com page load time and found that the first response time was 1.3 sec and then it took 23.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lower-back-pain-toolkit.com performance score

83

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.0 s

51/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value3.6 s

60/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value3.0 s

94/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value100 ms

98/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value3.4 s

93/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lower-back-pain-toolkit.com

1291 ms

www.lower-back-pain-toolkit.com

282 ms

A.style.css.pagespeed.cf.gjOEiOvGew.css

475 ms

A.mobile.css.pagespeed.cf.fD5JU2SWMk.css

473 ms

mobile.js.pagespeed.jm.iGor6uBi3W.js

476 ms

Our browser made a total of 41 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 39% of them (16 requests) were addressed to the original Lower-back-pain-toolkit.com, 17% (7 requests) were made to Apis.google.com and 10% (4 requests) were made to S7.addthis.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.3 sec) relates to the external source Cse.google.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 920.4 kB (59%)

Content Size

1.6 MB

After Optimization

631.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lower-back-pain-toolkit.com main page is 1.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.3 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-70%

Potential reduce by 48.2 kB

  • Original 68.5 kB
  • After minification 61.5 kB
  • After compression 20.3 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 48.2 kB or 70% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 4.8 kB

  • Original 146.9 kB
  • After minification 142.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lower Back Pain Toolkit images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-64%

Potential reduce by 826.5 kB

  • Original 1.3 MB
  • After minification 1.3 MB
  • After compression 458.7 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 826.5 kB or 64% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-80%

Potential reduce by 40.8 kB

  • Original 51.2 kB
  • After minification 41.6 kB
  • After compression 10.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lower-back-pain-toolkit.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 40.8 kB or 80% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 22 (61%)

Requests Now

36

After Optimization

14

  • AJAX
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 36 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lower Back Pain Toolkit. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 18 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lower-back-pain-toolkit.com

lower-back-pain-toolkit.com

1291 ms

www.lower-back-pain-toolkit.com

www.lower-back-pain-toolkit.com

282 ms

A.style.css.pagespeed.cf.gjOEiOvGew.css

A.style.css.pagespeed.cf.gjOEiOvGew.css

475 ms

A.mobile.css.pagespeed.cf.fD5JU2SWMk.css

A.mobile.css.pagespeed.cf.fD5JU2SWMk.css

473 ms

mobile.js.pagespeed.jm.iGor6uBi3W.js

mobile.js.pagespeed.jm.iGor6uBi3W.js

476 ms

fix.js.pagespeed.jm.hNqckcKb0T.js

fix.js.pagespeed.jm.hNqckcKb0T.js

601 ms

eucookie.js.pagespeed.jm.7E_ielp-yV.js

eucookie.js.pagespeed.jm.7E_ielp-yV.js

457 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

734 ms

branding.css

branding.css

1053 ms

addthis_widget.js

addthis_widget.js

1051 ms

plusone.js

plusone.js

1647 ms

HONConduct399447.js

HONConduct399447.js

1645 ms

ga.js

ga.js

1225 ms

gplus-16.png

gplus-16.png

684 ms

poweredby_FFFFFF.gif

poweredby_FFFFFF.gif

429 ms

body4.jpg.pagespeed.ce.2oyJYxdYT0.jpg

body4.jpg.pagespeed.ce.2oyJYxdYT0.jpg

429 ms

style.css.pagespeed.ce.ho6zHDIxfO.css

style.css.pagespeed.ce.ho6zHDIxfO.css

683 ms

xheadernew.jpg.pagespeed.ic.IkXRt43FDr.jpg

xheadernew.jpg.pagespeed.ic.IkXRt43FDr.jpg

430 ms

background3.jpg.pagespeed.ce.oy4xup4VoP.jpg

background3.jpg.pagespeed.ce.oy4xup4VoP.jpg

428 ms

body-chart-symptoms.gif.pagespeed.ce.MaC24klV_8.gif

body-chart-symptoms.gif.pagespeed.ce.MaC24klV_8.gif

682 ms

xcauses-of-back-pain-infographic-thumb.jpg.pagespeed.ic.gZGJJreFyG.jpg

xcauses-of-back-pain-infographic-thumb.jpg.pagespeed.ic.gZGJJreFyG.jpg

1136 ms

eucookie.js

eucookie.js

1070 ms

branding.css

branding.css

3256 ms

HONConduct399447.js

HONConduct399447.js

2546 ms

A.print.css.pagespeed.cf.MYsSyN5u0L.css

A.print.css.pagespeed.cf.MYsSyN5u0L.css

1673 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

75 ms

style.css.pagespeed.ce.ho6zHDIxfO.css

style.css.pagespeed.ce.ho6zHDIxfO.css

421 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

55 ms

HONConduct399447.jpg

HONConduct399447.jpg

2595 ms

_ate.track.config_resp

_ate.track.config_resp

1391 ms

300lo.json

300lo.json

721 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_1

cb=gapi.loaded_1

543 ms

fastbutton

fastbutton

719 ms

rs=AGLTcCOnDxwX8-LbpDmaxOBIoHm7W_kGNA

rs=AGLTcCOnDxwX8-LbpDmaxOBIoHm7W_kGNA

883 ms

sh.48536d49e4da3bdba54606b4.html

sh.48536d49e4da3bdba54606b4.html

1847 ms

counter.e61152ce165bc90fac45.js

counter.e61152ce165bc90fac45.js

1308 ms

postmessageRelay

postmessageRelay

1497 ms

971028622-postmessagerelay.js

971028622-postmessagerelay.js

1581 ms

rpc:shindig_random.js

rpc:shindig_random.js

1534 ms

shares.json

shares.json

1514 ms

cb=gapi.loaded_0

cb=gapi.loaded_0

49 ms

Accessibility Review

lower-back-pain-toolkit.com accessibility score

86

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Best Practices

lower-back-pain-toolkit.com best practices score

92

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lower-back-pain-toolkit.com SEO score

75

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Page is blocked from indexing

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    N/A

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lower-back-pain-toolkit.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Unfortunately we cannot identify language used on the page (probably there is a mix of languages, too little text or something else) and no language is claimed in <html> or <meta> tags either. Our system also found out that Lower-back-pain-toolkit.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lower-back-pain-toolkit.com

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Lower Back Pain Toolkit. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: