1.5 sec in total
192 ms
1.2 sec
131 ms
Visit lrg.com now to see the best up-to-date Lrg content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about lrg.com
Canada Life Reinsurance
Visit lrg.comWe analyzed Lrg.com page load time and found that the first response time was 192 ms and then it took 1.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 25% of websites can load faster.
lrg.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.2 s
19/100
10%
Value8.2 s
2/100
25%
Value5.3 s
59/100
10%
Value20 ms
100/100
30%
Value0.012
100/100
15%
Value6.6 s
57/100
10%
192 ms
282 ms
295 ms
120 ms
166 ms
Our browser made a total of 30 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 93% of them (28 requests) were addressed to the original Lrg.com, 7% (2 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (295 ms) belongs to the original domain Lrg.com.
Page size can be reduced by 97.8 kB (56%)
175.8 kB
78.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Lrg.com main page is 175.8 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. Only 10% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 103.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 18.7 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 4.2 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 18.7 kB or 81% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 226 B
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lrg images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 66.0 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 66.0 kB or 64% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 12.9 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lrg.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 12.9 kB or 80% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 18 (67%)
27
9
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lrg. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 8 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 6 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
lrg.com
192 ms
www.lrg.com
282 ms
index.htm
295 ms
sitenavigationfunctions.js
120 ms
sitenavigation.js
166 ms
ssajax.js
236 ms
s5_011306.css
179 ms
gwl_customfunctions.js
177 ms
s5_011141.js
276 ms
s5_011142.js
186 ms
s5_009601.js
224 ms
s5_011355.css
65 ms
s5_011356.css
62 ms
s5_011357.css
62 ms
s5_011358.css
63 ms
s5_011359.css
64 ms
s5_011333.jpg
88 ms
s5_012087.jpg
90 ms
s5_012089.jpg
91 ms
s5_011361.jpg
88 ms
s5_012147.gif
89 ms
s5_011336.gif
82 ms
s5_011337.gif
118 ms
s5_011331.gif
112 ms
s5_011334.gif
115 ms
s5_011324.gif
97 ms
s5_011326.gif
98 ms
s5_011335.gif
104 ms
ga.js
26 ms
__utm.gif
30 ms
lrg.com accessibility score
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
lrg.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
lrg.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
Tap targets are not sized appropriately
EN
N/A
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lrg.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lrg.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
lrg.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lrg. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: