Tools & Wizards About Us
lyme.com screenshot

Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 85

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 60% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 82

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    44% of websites

lyme.com

Lyme Technology Solutions

Page Load Speed

1.1 sec in total

First Response

235 ms

Resources Loaded

677 ms

Page Rendered

219 ms

lyme.com screenshot

About Website

Welcome to lyme.com homepage info - get ready to check Lyme best content for United States right away, or after learning these important things about lyme.com

Lyme Computer Systems, Inc has been extending its expertise in IT systems, developing customized IT services and end-to-end technology solutions for the Federal Government, prime contractors, and busi...

Visit lyme.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Lyme.com page load time and found that the first response time was 235 ms and then it took 896 ms to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 15% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

lyme.com performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.4 s

37/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.8 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value5.0 s

63/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value340 ms

74/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.004

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value8.6 s

37/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

lyme.com

235 ms

theme29279.css

70 ms

sw_funcs.js

37 ms

jquery-1.7.1.min.js

100 ms

jquery.cycle.all.2.74.js

77 ms

Our browser made a total of 69 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 78% of them (54 requests) were addressed to the original Lyme.com, 9% (6 requests) were made to Google-analytics.com and 7% (5 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (235 ms) belongs to the original domain Lyme.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 184.1 kB (27%)

Content Size

693.4 kB

After Optimization

509.3 kB

  • HTML
  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

In fact, the total size of Lyme.com main page is 693.4 kB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 421.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-88%

Potential reduce by 31.5 kB

  • Original 35.6 kB
  • After minification 22.9 kB
  • After compression 4.1 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 12.7 kB, which is 36% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 31.5 kB or 88% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-0%

Potential reduce by 77 B

  • Original 421.1 kB
  • After minification 421.1 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Lyme images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-63%

Potential reduce by 139.4 kB

  • Original 220.8 kB
  • After minification 201.6 kB
  • After compression 81.4 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 139.4 kB or 63% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-83%

Potential reduce by 13.1 kB

  • Original 15.8 kB
  • After minification 12.3 kB
  • After compression 2.7 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Lyme.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 13.1 kB or 83% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 34 (56%)

Requests Now

61

After Optimization

27

  • Images
  • JavaScript
  • CSS

The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Lyme. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 7 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.

Network Requests Diagram

lyme.com

lyme.com

235 ms

theme29279.css

theme29279.css

70 ms

sw_funcs.js

sw_funcs.js

37 ms

jquery-1.7.1.min.js

jquery-1.7.1.min.js

100 ms

jquery.cycle.all.2.74.js

jquery.cycle.all.2.74.js

77 ms

custom.js

custom.js

42 ms

CustomContentScript.js

CustomContentScript.js

47 ms

css

css

26 ms

ga.js

ga.js

15 ms

page_top_bg.gif

page_top_bg.gif

150 ms

searchPan_left.gif

searchPan_left.gif

148 ms

searchPan_mid.gif

searchPan_mid.gif

145 ms

scrch_button.gif

scrch_button.gif

145 ms

searchPan_right.gif

searchPan_right.gif

146 ms

logo.gif

logo.gif

149 ms

request_quote.gif

request_quote.gif

155 ms

contact_img.gif

contact_img.gif

157 ms

navpan_bg.gif

navpan_bg.gif

152 ms

banner-bg.gif

banner-bg.gif

155 ms

slider3.jpg

slider3.jpg

165 ms

ban-con-bg.png

ban-con-bg.png

158 ms

ban-butt.png

ban-butt.png

159 ms

slider2.jpg

slider2.jpg

169 ms

slider1.jpg

slider1.jpg

197 ms

slider4.jpg

slider4.jpg

167 ms

blank.gif

blank.gif

161 ms

news.gif

news.gif

164 ms

news-repeat.gif

news-repeat.gif

167 ms

news-right.gif

news-right.gif

168 ms

body_img_01.gif

body_img_01.gif

197 ms

body_img_02.gif

body_img_02.gif

197 ms

body_img_03.gif

body_img_03.gif

195 ms

body_img_04.gif

body_img_04.gif

196 ms

body_img_05.gif

body_img_05.gif

197 ms

contactPan_top.gif

contactPan_top.gif

197 ms

contactPan_mid.gif

contactPan_mid.gif

204 ms

schedulepan_innr.gif

schedulepan_innr.gif

202 ms

schedulepan_innr_img.gif

schedulepan_innr_img.gif

197 ms

learn-button.gif

learn-button.gif

203 ms

contactPan_bottom.gif

contactPan_bottom.gif

232 ms

systemInc_top.gif

systemInc_top.gif

205 ms

systemInc_mid.gif

systemInc_mid.gif

232 ms

systemInc_mid_grad.gif

systemInc_mid_grad.gif

231 ms

systemInc_bottom.gif

systemInc_bottom.gif

233 ms

partner_top.gif

partner_top.gif

232 ms

analytics.js

analytics.js

69 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

61 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

59 ms

__utm.gif

__utm.gif

60 ms

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3aCWcynf_cDxXwCLxiixG1c.ttf

56 ms

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTYnF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

57 ms

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSonF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

60 ms

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzInF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

57 ms

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

EInbV5DfGHOiMmvb1Xr-honF5uFdDttMLvmWuJdhhgs.ttf

56 ms

partner_mid.gif

partner_mid.gif

97 ms

partner_grad.gif

partner_grad.gif

117 ms

partner_img01.gif

partner_img01.gif

126 ms

partner_img02.gif

partner_img02.gif

125 ms

partner_img03.gif

partner_img03.gif

123 ms

partner_bottom.gif

partner_bottom.gif

110 ms

twitter.gif

twitter.gif

112 ms

facebook.gif

facebook.gif

142 ms

linkedin.gif

linkedin.gif

140 ms

footer_devider.gif

footer_devider.gif

139 ms

sw_logo.gif

sw_logo.gif

160 ms

collect

collect

86 ms

collect

collect

17 ms

collect

collect

101 ms

ga-audiences

ga-audiences

41 ms

Accessibility Review

lyme.com accessibility score

85

Accessibility Issues

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Best Practices

lyme.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Page has valid source maps

SEO Factors

lyme.com SEO score

82

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Document doesn't have a <title> element

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Lyme.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Lyme.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

lyme.com

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Lyme. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: