27.1 sec in total
809 ms
25.1 sec
1.2 sec
Visit nasty235.ltalk.ru now to see the best up-to-date Nasty 235 Ltalk content for United States and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about nasty235.ltalk.ru
Visit nasty235.ltalk.ruWe analyzed Nasty235.ltalk.ru page load time and found that the first response time was 809 ms and then it took 26.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is an excellent result, as only a small number of websites can load faster. Unfortunately, there was 1 request timeout, which can generally increase the web page load time, as the browser stays idle while waiting for website response.
nasty235.ltalk.ru performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value1.8 s
91/100
10%
Value1.8 s
99/100
25%
Value5.3 s
58/100
10%
Value2,470 ms
4/100
30%
Value0.626
9/100
15%
Value10.4 s
24/100
10%
809 ms
694 ms
631 ms
2986 ms
348 ms
Our browser made a total of 117 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 1% of them (1 request) were addressed to the original Nasty235.ltalk.ru, 43% (50 requests) were made to Ltalk.ru and 21% (25 requests) were made to Ads.betweendigital.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (20.2 sec) relates to the external source Imrk.net.
Page size can be reduced by 169.4 kB (16%)
1.0 MB
877.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Nasty235.ltalk.ru main page is 1.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 20% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 832.5 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 59.9 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 59.9 kB or 82% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 9.1 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Nasty 235 Ltalk images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 60.4 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 60.4 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 40.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Nasty235.ltalk.ru needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 40.0 kB or 83% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 85 (83%)
102
17
The browser has sent 102 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Nasty 235 Ltalk. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 12 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
nasty235.ltalk.ru
809 ms
main.css
694 ms
style.css
631 ms
main.js
2986 ms
188244.js
348 ms
188245.js
364 ms
227163.js
1196 ms
apu.php
778 ms
286980.js
1132 ms
bodybg.png
4326 ms
3.gif
1270 ms
2.gif
1412 ms
1.png
676 ms
design-off.png
233 ms
emp.gif
208 ms
offline.png
371 ms
rss20.gif
360 ms
atom03.gif
370 ms
opml11.gif
372 ms
blog.png
370 ms
discuss.png
359 ms
thumbs-up.png
519 ms
t.cgi
562 ms
showad_full.js
459 ms
headbg.png
1243 ms
context.js
309 ms
crumbsbg.png
649 ms
menubg.png
5299 ms
user.png
410 ms
datebg.png
946 ms
postbg.png
1131 ms
bottombg.png
4684 ms
b.gif
346 ms
i.gif
347 ms
u.gif
348 ms
s.gif
359 ms
h.gif
449 ms
off.gif
448 ms
center.gif
460 ms
right.gif
464 ms
quote.gif
464 ms
clear.png
461 ms
video.gif
611 ms
audio.png
610 ms
blogs.png
610 ms
translit.gif
612 ms
smile.png
612 ms
sad.png
611 ms
wink.png
749 ms
kiss.png
749 ms
big-smile.png
765 ms
surprised.png
771 ms
tongue-sticking-out.png
793 ms
angry.png
793 ms
devil.png
959 ms
angel.png
957 ms
cry.png
957 ms
upset.png
958 ms
confused.png
1027 ms
undecided.png
1022 ms
analytics.js
84 ms
floating.js
150 ms
collect
65 ms
thinking.png
974 ms
cunning.png
965 ms
tired.png
1012 ms
crazy.png
1017 ms
shhh.png
1018 ms
shocked.png
1018 ms
context_static_r1084.js
375 ms
1x1.gif
234 ms
sun-glasses.png
1062 ms
turn-red.png
1053 ms
thumbs-down.png
1504 ms
sep.gif
1509 ms
adi
424 ms
adi
517 ms
t.cgi
154 ms
adi
333 ms
34376
188 ms
watch.js
15 ms
bidder.html
169 ms
sync2.302
884 ms
sync.cgi
451 ms
betweendigital.gif
1621 ms
sync
161 ms
userbind
20221 ms
sync
453 ms
between
815 ms
sync
447 ms
between
1331 ms
bdi
471 ms
between-sync
1358 ms
u.rtb-box.com
381 ms
match
230 ms
match
653 ms
match
121 ms
match
588 ms
admitad
364 ms
match
191 ms
match
194 ms
match
117 ms
between
133 ms
match
119 ms
match
495 ms
match
119 ms
match
114 ms
match
121 ms
match
108 ms
match
144 ms
match
155 ms
match
156 ms
match
164 ms
match
139 ms
match
141 ms
match
115 ms
match
125 ms
nasty235.ltalk.ru accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
<frame> or <iframe> elements do not have a title
nasty235.ltalk.ru best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Browser errors were logged to the console
nasty235.ltalk.ru SEO score
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
RU
RU
WINDOWS-1251
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Nasty235.ltalk.ru can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Russian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Nasty235.ltalk.ru main page’s claimed encoding is windows-1251. Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.
nasty235.ltalk.ru
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Nasty 235 Ltalk. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: