4 sec in total
393 ms
3.5 sec
140 ms
Visit mamut.com now to see the best up-to-date Mamut content for Norway and also check out these interesting facts you probably never knew about mamut.com
Visit mamut.comWe analyzed Mamut.com page load time and found that the first response time was 393 ms and then it took 3.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 60% of websites can load faster.
mamut.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value4.4 s
17/100
10%
Value8.4 s
2/100
25%
Value7.9 s
22/100
10%
Value340 ms
75/100
30%
Value0
100/100
15%
Value11.1 s
20/100
10%
393 ms
226 ms
618 ms
215 ms
215 ms
Our browser made a total of 33 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Mamut.com, 12% (4 requests) were made to Font.visma.com and 9% (3 requests) were made to S1343588892.t.eloqua.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (833 ms) relates to the external source Font.visma.com.
Page size can be reduced by 266.4 kB (25%)
1.1 MB
798.8 kB
In fact, the total size of Mamut.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 722.1 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 15.5 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. This page needs HTML code to be minified as it can gain 3.8 kB, which is 18% of the original size. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 15.5 kB or 77% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 8.2 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mamut images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 191.6 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 191.6 kB or 73% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 51.1 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mamut.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 51.1 kB or 82% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 16 (59%)
27
11
The browser has sent 27 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mamut. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 11 to 1 for JavaScripts and as a result speed up the page load time.
www.visma.co.uk
393 ms
css
226 ms
jshead
618 ms
globalstylepatches.js
215 ms
gtm_visma.co.uk.js
215 ms
homepage_clickable_text_box.js
220 ms
ba_hotfixes.css
222 ms
jsfoot
320 ms
gtm.js
62 ms
18x20_uk.png
115 ms
countrychooser_arrow_down.gif
113 ms
logo_larger.png
109 ms
mainmenu-arrow.png
105 ms
top_search_button.png
105 ms
ajax_load_transp.gif
113 ms
PFBeauSansPro-Light.woff
822 ms
PFBeauSansPro-SemiBold.woff
819 ms
social_icons_ferdig_twitter.png
205 ms
PFBeauSansPro-Thin.woff
833 ms
int_1920x410_office_tablet.jpg
518 ms
analytics.js
22 ms
hotjar-85590.js
132 ms
elqCfg.min.js
6 ms
svrGP
31 ms
svrGP
30 ms
collect
16 ms
collect
70 ms
svrGP.aspx
6 ms
modules-1f5c71aea63f8df71401422ed80fbe5f.js
26 ms
visit-data
206 ms
ae_banner1.jpg
120 ms
int_1920x410_office.jpg
561 ms
PFBeauSansPro-XThin.woff
698 ms
mamut.com accessibility score
ARIA
These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
[aria-*] attributes do not match their roles
ARIA input fields do not have accessible names
mamut.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
mamut.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mamut.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mamut.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mamut.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Mamut. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: