Access mar1e.fr. Marie Pourreyron

Report Summary

About Website

Welcome to mar1e.fr homepage info - get ready to check Mar 1 E best content for France right away, or after learning these important things about mar1e.fr

Référencement, 2.0, g33k, apple & co

Visit mar1e.fr

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value6.2 s

3/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value7.3 s

4/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value9.4 s

12/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value700 ms

42/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.012

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value12.0 s

16/100

10%

mar1e.fr

281 ms

www.mar1e.fr

3876 ms

js

22 ms

ga.js

21 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

169 ms

Our browser made a total of 90 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (42 requests) were addressed to the original Mar1e.fr, 22% (20 requests) were made to Scontent.cdninstagram.com and 11% (10 requests) were made to Apis.google.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.9 sec) belongs to the original domain Mar1e.fr.

Content Size

3.1 MB

After Optimization

2.5 MB

In fact, the total size of Mar1e.fr main page is 3.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 2.4 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-79%

Potential reduce by 55.0 kB

Original 69.7 kB
After minification 65.4 kB
After compression 14.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 55.0 kB or 79% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-3%

Potential reduce by 69.2 kB

Original 2.4 MB
After minification 2.3 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Mar 1 E images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-68%

Potential reduce by 257.6 kB

Original 378.3 kB
After minification 368.7 kB
After compression 120.6 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 257.6 kB or 68% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 278.1 kB

Original 326.4 kB
After minification 279.8 kB
After compression 48.3 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mar1e.fr needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 278.1 kB or 85% of the original size.

Requests Now

After Optimization

The browser has sent 87 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Mar 1 E. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 27 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 11 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Issues

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

High

Buttons do not have an accessible name

High

Form elements do not have associated labels

High

Links do not have a discernible name

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Areas of Improvement

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

Language Detected

FR
Language Claimed

FR
Encoding

UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mar1e.fr can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that French is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mar1e.fr main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

mar1e.fr

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Mar 1 E. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook:

Report Summary

Performance

Accessibility

Best Practices

SEO

Marie Pourreyron - Consultant SEO

Page Load Speed

First Response

Resources Loaded

Page Rendered

About Website

Key Findings

Performance Metrics

Measured Metrics

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

SI (Speed Index)

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

TTI (Time to Interactive)