Report Summary

  • 98

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    95% of other websites

  • 89

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 72% of websites

  • 83

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    56% of websites

  • 73

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    31% of websites

medfish.com

Medfish Magazine

Page Load Speed

2.7 sec in total

First Response

223 ms

Resources Loaded

2.1 sec

Page Rendered

455 ms

medfish.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Medfish content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about medfish.com

Visit medfish.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Medfish.com page load time and found that the first response time was 223 ms and then it took 2.5 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 45% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

medfish.com performance score

98

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value1.7 s

93/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value2.1 s

96/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value0 ms

100/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value1.7 s

100/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

medfish.com

223 ms

ezine

257 ms

99 ms

style.css

69 ms

glide.css

135 ms

Our browser made a total of 106 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 45% of them (48 requests) were addressed to the original Medfish.com, 5% (5 requests) were made to Dsum-sec.casalemedia.com and 5% (5 requests) were made to Cm.g.doubleclick.net. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (677 ms) belongs to the original domain Medfish.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.7 MB (66%)

Content Size

2.6 MB

After Optimization

872.2 kB

In fact, the total size of Medfish.com main page is 2.6 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 60% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 1.9 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-44%

Potential reduce by 222 B

  • Original 508 B
  • After minification 506 B
  • After compression 286 B

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 222 B or 44% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-18%

Potential reduce by 91.2 kB

  • Original 508.2 kB
  • After minification 417.0 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Obviously, Medfish needs image optimization as it can save up to 91.2 kB or 18% of the original volume. The most popular and efficient tools for JPEG and PNG image optimization are Jpegoptim and PNG Crush.

JavaScript Optimization

-77%

Potential reduce by 1.5 MB

  • Original 1.9 MB
  • After minification 1.9 MB
  • After compression 437.0 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 1.5 MB or 77% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-87%

Potential reduce by 123.9 kB

  • Original 141.9 kB
  • After minification 135.3 kB
  • After compression 17.9 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Medfish.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 123.9 kB or 87% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 53 (59%)

Requests Now

90

After Optimization

37

The browser has sent 90 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Medfish. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 24 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 4 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

medfish.com accessibility score

89

Accessibility Issues

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Best Practices

medfish.com best practices score

83

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

SEO Factors

medfish.com SEO score

73

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    N/A

  • Encoding

    N/A

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Medfish.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and neither this language nor any other was claimed in <html> or <meta> tags. Our system also found out that Medfish.com main page’s claimed encoding is . Changing it to UTF-8 can be a good choice, as this format is commonly used for encoding all over the web and thus their visitors won’t have any troubles with symbol transcription or reading.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Medfish. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: