2.9 sec in total
193 ms
2.1 sec
606 ms
Click here to check amazing Media Sift content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about mediasift.com
Break through the noise with Meltwater: Media Intelligence, Consumer & Sales Intelligence, Social Listening, Influencer Marketing, and more.
Visit mediasift.comWe analyzed Mediasift.com page load time and found that the first response time was 193 ms and then it took 2.7 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 50% of websites can load faster.
mediasift.com performance score
name
value
score
weighting
Value2.8 s
57/100
10%
Value11.5 s
0/100
25%
Value13.0 s
2/100
10%
Value3,940 ms
1/100
30%
Value0.064
97/100
15%
Value23.1 s
1/100
10%
193 ms
33 ms
25 ms
67 ms
177 ms
Our browser made a total of 74 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 0% of them (0 request) were addressed to the original Mediasift.com, 5% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com and 3% (2 requests) were made to Hittail.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (730 ms) relates to the external source Datasift.com.
Page size can be reduced by 484.2 kB (41%)
1.2 MB
696.0 kB
In fact, the total size of Mediasift.com main page is 1.2 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 40% of websites need less resources to load. Javascripts take 553.7 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.
Potential reduce by 24.2 kB
HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 24.2 kB or 75% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 35.7 kB
Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Media Sift images are well optimized though.
Potential reduce by 361.3 kB
It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 361.3 kB or 65% of the original size.
Potential reduce by 63.0 kB
CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Mediasift.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 63.0 kB or 81% of the original size.
Number of requests can be reduced by 31 (51%)
61
30
The browser has sent 61 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Media Sift. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 28 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 5 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.
datasift.com
193 ms
3065640545.js
33 ms
css
25 ms
css
67 ms
global.css
177 ms
home.css
184 ms
require.js
212 ms
oct.js
66 ms
conversion.js
17 ms
news-banner.js
182 ms
analytics.js
24 ms
datasift-logo.png
175 ms
home-pattern.png
364 ms
pylon-diagram.png
389 ms
integrate_icon.png
177 ms
real_time_icon.png
240 ms
normalize_icon.png
167 ms
arrow-left.png
323 ms
arrow-right.png
341 ms
intense.png
346 ms
video.png
405 ms
blogs.png
480 ms
message-board.png
524 ms
enrich.png
534 ms
mine.png
514 ms
insights.png
553 ms
vedo_illustration@2x.png
568 ms
cityscape.jpg
647 ms
the-best-of-the-best.png
730 ms
tag.js
95 ms
adsct
168 ms
adsct
86 ms
102 ms
6Egv8e1X.min.js
64 ms
collect
18 ms
app.js
612 ms
3998.js
31 ms
k3k702ZOKiLJc3WVjuplzKRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff
14 ms
MTP_ySUJH_bn48VBG8sNSqRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff
11 ms
cJZKeOuBrn4kERxqtaUH3bO3LdcAZYWl9Si6vvxL-qU.woff
20 ms
DXI1ORHCpsQm3Vp6mXoaTaRDOzjiPcYnFooOUGCOsRk.woff
21 ms
ds-icons.woff
454 ms
ip.json
74 ms
pixel
19 ms
collect
79 ms
pixel
37 ms
60 ms
.jsonp
141 ms
ga-audiences
17 ms
storage.min.html
122 ms
5882353
53 ms
zones
78 ms
storage.min.html
208 ms
global.js
164 ms
home.js
165 ms
zepto.min.js
170 ms
stickynav.js
215 ms
retina.js
161 ms
journey.js
156 ms
video.js
164 ms
homeSlider.js
164 ms
tooltips.js
8 ms
mustache.js
153 ms
require-text.js
254 ms
munchkin.js
17 ms
mlt.js
15 ms
index.json
213 ms
8664.js
17 ms
blank.js
15 ms
munchkin.js
6 ms
visitWebPage
164 ms
blank.js
23 ms
video.mustache
133 ms
journey.css
163 ms
mediasift.com accessibility score
Names and labels
These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.
Impact
Issue
Buttons do not have an accessible name
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Links do not have a discernible name
Contrast
These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.
Impact
Issue
Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.
Best practices
These items highlight common accessibility best practices.
Impact
Issue
[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.
mediasift.com best practices score
Trust and Safety
Impact
Issue
Does not use HTTPS
Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities
Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks
General
Impact
Issue
Detected JavaScript libraries
mediasift.com SEO score
Content Best Practices
Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.
Impact
Issue
Links do not have descriptive text
Image elements do not have [alt] attributes
Mobile Friendly
Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).
Impact
Issue
Document uses legible font sizes
EN
EN
UTF-8
Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Mediasift.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Mediasift.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.
mediasift.com
Open Graph description is not detected on the main page of Media Sift. Lack of Open Graph description can be counter-productive for their social media presence, as such a description allows converting a website homepage (or other pages) into good-looking, rich and well-structured posts, when it is being shared on Facebook and other social media. For example, adding the following code snippet into HTML <head> tag will help to represent this web page correctly in social networks: