Report Summary

  • 32

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    52% of other websites

  • 83

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 56% of websites

  • 67

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    24% of websites

  • 91

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    71% of websites

michellepaine.com

Michelle Arnold Paine Artist

Page Load Speed

1.6 sec in total

First Response

31 ms

Resources Loaded

1.4 sec

Page Rendered

207 ms

michellepaine.com screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Michelle Paine content. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about michellepaine.com

Home is a web page that can be viewed at Michelle Arnold Paine Fine Art .

Visit michellepaine.com

Key Findings

We analyzed Michellepaine.com page load time and found that the first response time was 31 ms and then it took 1.6 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is quite a good result, as only 30% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

michellepaine.com performance score

32

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value11.5 s

0/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value14.7 s

0/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value14.0 s

1/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value480 ms

60/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0.1

90/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value15.1 s

7/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

michellepaine.com

31 ms

www.michellepaine.com

330 ms

jquery-ui.css

127 ms

etsy360-cart-styles.css

13 ms

jquery.fancybox.css

17 ms

Our browser made a total of 72 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 47% of them (34 requests) were addressed to the original Michellepaine.com, 14% (10 requests) were made to Static.xx.fbcdn.net and 7% (5 requests) were made to Etsy.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (330 ms) belongs to the original domain Michellepaine.com.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 650.1 kB (58%)

Content Size

1.1 MB

After Optimization

463.1 kB

In fact, the total size of Michellepaine.com main page is 1.1 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 70% of websites need less resources to load. CSS take 498.3 kB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-76%

Potential reduce by 28.1 kB

  • Original 36.8 kB
  • After minification 33.3 kB
  • After compression 8.7 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 28.1 kB or 76% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-1%

Potential reduce by 3.8 kB

  • Original 267.6 kB
  • After minification 263.7 kB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Michelle Paine images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-67%

Potential reduce by 207.4 kB

  • Original 310.6 kB
  • After minification 281.4 kB
  • After compression 103.1 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 207.4 kB or 67% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-82%

Potential reduce by 410.7 kB

  • Original 498.3 kB
  • After minification 446.5 kB
  • After compression 87.6 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Michellepaine.com needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 410.7 kB or 82% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 45 (68%)

Requests Now

66

After Optimization

21

The browser has sent 66 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Michelle Paine. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 29 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 18 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

michellepaine.com accessibility score

83

Accessibility Issues

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

[id] attributes on active, focusable elements are not unique

Internationalization and localization

These are opportunities to improve the interpretation of your content by users in different locales.

Impact

Issue

High

<html> element does not have a [lang] attribute

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Best Practices

michellepaine.com best practices score

67

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

High

Includes front-end JavaScript libraries with known security vulnerabilities

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Displays images with incorrect aspect ratio

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

High

Browser errors were logged to the console

High

Missing source maps for large first-party JavaScript

SEO Factors

michellepaine.com SEO score

91

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Crawling and Indexing

To appear in search results, crawlers need access to your app.

Impact

Issue

High

Links are not crawlable

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    EN

  • Language Claimed

    EN

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Michellepaine.com can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that English is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Michellepaine.com main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Michelle Paine. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: