Report Summary

  • 52

    Performance

    Renders faster than
    70% of other websites

  • 65

    Accessibility

    Visual factors better than
    that of 31% of websites

  • 85

    Best Practices

    More advanced features
    available than in
    81% of websites

  • 92

    SEO

    Google-friendlier than
    75% of websites

missionline.it

Missionline | il portale del business travel e del fleet management

Page Load Speed

11.8 sec in total

First Response

1.5 sec

Resources Loaded

9.1 sec

Page Rendered

1.2 sec

missionline.it screenshot

About Website

Click here to check amazing Missionline content for Italy. Otherwise, check out these important facts you probably never knew about missionline.it

il portale del business travel e del fleet management

Visit missionline.it

Key Findings

We analyzed Missionline.it page load time and found that the first response time was 1.5 sec and then it took 10.3 sec to load all DOM resources and completely render a web page. This is a poor result, as 90% of websites can load faster.

Performance Metrics

missionline.it performance score

52

Measured Metrics

name

value

score

weighting

FCP (First Contentful Paint)

Value3.9 s

26/100

10%

LCP (Largest Contentful Paint)

Value8.1 s

3/100

25%

SI (Speed Index)

Value6.2 s

44/100

10%

TBT (Total Blocking Time)

Value320 ms

77/100

30%

CLS (Cumulative Layout Shift)

Value0

100/100

15%

TTI (Time to Interactive)

Value5.9 s

66/100

10%

Network Requests Diagram

www.missionline.it

1497 ms

wp-emoji-release.min.js

294 ms

prettyPhoto.css

266 ms

wp-video-lightbox.css

208 ms

styles.css

202 ms

Our browser made a total of 137 requests to load all elements on the main page. We found that 85% of them (117 requests) were addressed to the original Missionline.it, 4% (5 requests) were made to Streaming.ad-balancer.at and 3% (4 requests) were made to Fonts.gstatic.com. The less responsive or slowest element that took the longest time to load (3.1 sec) belongs to the original domain Missionline.it.

Page Optimization Overview & Recommendations

Page size can be reduced by 1.1 MB (38%)

Content Size

3.0 MB

After Optimization

1.8 MB

In fact, the total size of Missionline.it main page is 3.0 MB. This result falls beyond the top 1M of websites and identifies a large and not optimized web page that may take ages to load. 45% of websites need less resources to load. Images take 1.6 MB which makes up the majority of the site volume.

HTML Optimization

-85%

Potential reduce by 121.3 kB

  • Original 143.1 kB
  • After minification 136.5 kB
  • After compression 21.8 kB

HTML content can be minified and compressed by a website’s server. The most efficient way is to compress content using GZIP which reduces data amount travelling through the network between server and browser. HTML code on this page is well minified. It is highly recommended that content of this web page should be compressed using GZIP, as it can save up to 121.3 kB or 85% of the original size.

Image Optimization

-4%

Potential reduce by 62.8 kB

  • Original 1.6 MB
  • After minification 1.5 MB

Image size optimization can help to speed up a website loading time. The chart above shows the difference between the size before and after optimization. Missionline images are well optimized though.

JavaScript Optimization

-71%

Potential reduce by 544.1 kB

  • Original 767.9 kB
  • After minification 711.9 kB
  • After compression 223.8 kB

It’s better to minify JavaScript in order to improve website performance. The diagram shows the current total size of all JavaScript files against the prospective JavaScript size after its minification and compression. It is highly recommended that all JavaScript files should be compressed and minified as it can save up to 544.1 kB or 71% of the original size.

CSS Optimization

-81%

Potential reduce by 398.3 kB

  • Original 493.0 kB
  • After minification 391.8 kB
  • After compression 94.8 kB

CSS files minification is very important to reduce a web page rendering time. The faster CSS files can load, the earlier a page can be rendered. Missionline.it needs all CSS files to be minified and compressed as it can save up to 398.3 kB or 81% of the original size.

Requests Breakdown

Number of requests can be reduced by 82 (63%)

Requests Now

130

After Optimization

48

The browser has sent 130 CSS, Javascripts, AJAX and image requests in order to completely render the main page of Missionline. We recommend that multiple CSS and JavaScript files should be merged into one by each type, as it can help reduce assets requests from 51 to 1 for JavaScripts and from 33 to 1 for CSS and as a result speed up the page load time.

Accessibility Review

missionline.it accessibility score

65

Accessibility Issues

ARIA

These are opportunities to improve the usage of ARIA in your application which may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

ARIA input fields do not have accessible names

High

Elements with an ARIA [role] that require children to contain a specific [role] are missing some or all of those required children.

Contrast

These are opportunities to improve the legibility of your content.

Impact

Issue

High

Background and foreground colors do not have a sufficient contrast ratio.

Navigation

These are opportunities to improve keyboard navigation in your application.

Impact

Issue

High

Heading elements are not in a sequentially-descending order

Names and labels

These are opportunities to improve the semantics of the controls in your application. This may enhance the experience for users of assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

High

Links do not have a discernible name

Tables and lists

These are opportunities to improve the experience of reading tabular or list data using assistive technology, like a screen reader.

Impact

Issue

High

Lists do not contain only <li> elements and script supporting elements (<script> and <template>).

Best practices

These items highlight common accessibility best practices.

Impact

Issue

High

The document uses <meta http-equiv="refresh">

High

[user-scalable="no"] is used in the <meta name="viewport"> element or the [maximum-scale] attribute is less than 5.

Best Practices

missionline.it best practices score

85

Areas of Improvement

Trust and Safety

Impact

Issue

High

Does not use HTTPS

Low

Ensure CSP is effective against XSS attacks

User Experience

Impact

Issue

High

Serves images with low resolution

General

Impact

Issue

Low

Detected JavaScript libraries

SEO Factors

missionline.it SEO score

92

Search Engine Optimization Advices

Content Best Practices

Format your HTML in a way that enables crawlers to better understand your app’s content.

Impact

Issue

High

Image elements do not have [alt] attributes

Mobile Friendly

Make sure your pages are mobile friendly so users don’t have to pinch or zoom in order to read the content pages. [Learn more](https://developers.google.com/search/mobile-sites/).

Impact

Issue

High

Document uses legible font sizes

High

Tap targets are not sized appropriately

Language and Encoding

  • Language Detected

    IT

  • Language Claimed

    IT

  • Encoding

    UTF-8

Language claimed in HTML meta tag should match the language actually used on the web page. Otherwise Missionline.it can be misinterpreted by Google and other search engines. Our service has detected that Italian is used on the page, and it matches the claimed language. Our system also found out that Missionline.it main page’s claimed encoding is utf-8. Use of this encoding format is the best practice as the main page visitors from all over the world won’t have any issues with symbol transcription.

Social Sharing Optimization

Open Graph data is detected on the main page of Missionline. This is the best way to make the web page social media friendly. Here is how it looks like on Facebook: